IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6660521E80E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.64
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.64 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.959, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZWzCoUuSfMON for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com (mail-pb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3F121E80C6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id rp2so6683062pbb.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v55QkCVhdik9PS/N1bmt8Kv3Vcd4mb//IwhZ9jMezsw=; b=neI4mGQ5fsUB5ap7b52Dp5lEyxdjzrhPRg/jPOXGU/Y+h60qL/p+/xsGs0ldS/dwy2 MmvcNYlHJuE7pKeJIATT4KStvlpleJeXxtYcjPbW0RYA/MlId7RoMsHUmXKhtpDDSlq5 6bQ6GO8PuFauKQ1d5FuOK3/YSNrv/5JKRitkcgkqRED7ndq5APNBaH0IAeuNZn23Rszb lElZT4qSw96Qs8Q8JaZOb/XNpnQdnWQGOw3LbcIdB3FzdzyAVoHkqgRiC9hD7WiEJ9pd JhFBUTql+DBBnNpUCk0hycgizL7LA3QnkRnjnv0X2sQHRU/cdKAEANmCSmD8MwR2hnPm qKYQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.170.168 with SMTP id an8mr30521pac.58.1378251155706; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (250.200.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.200.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a5sm25020593pbw.4.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52267194.9030907@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:32:36 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com> <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com> <52266EB3.7050800@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52266EB3.7050800@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>, "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 23:32:36 -0000

On 04/09/2013 11:20, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> On 9/3/2013 6:02 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> On 9/3/13 3:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> <rant class="short">So that the reader of RFC 2026 will need to read yet
>>> another document to get the full picture? There are currently 8 RFCs
>>> that
>>> update RFC 2026, some of which have been updated themselves.</rant>
>>>
>>> Quite seriously - I appreciate Pete's reluctance to overload the
>>> draft, but
>>> it is a related topic. I'd be inclined to include it.
>>
>> OK, does this do anything for anyone?
>>
>>    Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
>>    publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
>>    and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter.  This has also not
>>    been done in recent years, and the "publication of record" for
>>    standards actions has for some time been the minutes of the IESG.
>>    [IESG-MINUTES] Therefore, that paragraph is also effectively removed
>>    from section 6.1.3.
> 
> That would work for me.
> 
> Spencer

Me too.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email