Re: "Early rebid" (was Re: letters from Ted & Alissa)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 04 July 2019 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F41206CE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KyOtyVFLxGF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 393991207C0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 06:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id k8so5417556eds.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 06:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BrABZVkhBcvd5zPwadEVgDDXsqzW1Lxl2P5y+GHP5n8=; b=YdSHjDkVSIdfkhqD3w+xS75JmxClGRKiNyD0TlHWgfwui+V1vvUxlcUgNOkbbQSPZc JpTXOQmi2sYbn7M6fnbZKa3h4dgzImb7Pba+5+1H4+Y3aJ/yptoIZUl70txZOXgQa7sG icloGR6GnIaJU2HJULyoB9h8iI5aCZql3RNQpwx3vR2DTsGinjknYSMZOl5hVC0iuDoo 4Uqnv9VJEm3pypsC+gGTF1du3u/OPHZGIsz0PNgblmeKNiQ9Wq1RHDY+uXKu39UloANK YgAmlJ022M+QjuWC9jasgS+9g3hBZXKOF4nv9EtQDV4a3q1AAEGrcPLd5p9zl62ljxnG C9xQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFJNMtg5hhYEOXK6dtnI0dB6VcpHAYDnUWW9US+/Ji+m2HYoCw H2DcVVawwVglChP8WGTe7vARqA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlKlt5fcn2JPJNuwlhDKZobhXpsoB0mbQYBhduTifQz0Vk1LXggpk/HCPNnJa9pOQsxKdE8A==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:b7a7:: with SMTP id h36mr49082919ede.234.1562246751181; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 06:25:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:544f:5a72:3dc9:e352]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z22sm1659006edz.6.2019.07.04.06.25.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jul 2019 06:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 15:25:48 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: "Early rebid" (was Re: letters from Ted & Alissa)
Message-ID: <20190704132548.GD49950@hanna.meerval.net>
References: <CA+9kkMCi=h1W15T-rt3MAu3NHBYdEaycUPw4XhRDBVNL4k_Xrg@mail.gmail.com> <BB4BA38F-B384-46A3-866C-4A61F4C7C681@sobco.com> <20190703221444.fvweit2qwmo5u4jp@mx4.yitter.info> <815cdd1d-c544-23a6-33ec-d8cff473f385@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <815cdd1d-c544-23a6-33ec-d8cff473f385@comcast.net>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NVwCAfIkswKLogzvYkKrhtQB2OE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:26:15 -0000

Dear Mike,

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:20:46AM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
> On 7/3/2019 6:14 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > As usual, I'm employed by ISOC but not speaking for it.
> 
> It's pretty hard to not take the above with a grain of salt. You're not just
> an ISOC employee, but the president and CEO and as such have a lot of sway
> over the funding ISOC provides to the IETF. I can't imagine the I*  and
> community not giving your statements more weight than they might another
> generic IETF participant just because you say you're speaking for yourself. 
> It feels somewhat passive/aggressive too but that may just be me.
> 
> I can't remember Lynn or Cathy making a "not speaking for" statement in the
> time they were in your job, but this is the third from you in last day or
> so.  I wondering if it's really appropriate for you to do so given the
> relationships between the two organizations and your position?

I'd like to ask you for clarification on the above, do you mean to say
that the self-declaration is unnecessary, or that Andrew should refrain
from participating in a discussion three times a day?

Kind regards,

Job