IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Posting and disclaimer (was Re: "Early rebid" (was Re: letters from Ted & Alissa))

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Tue, 09 July 2019 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DA012008F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8OBuNmJCNn_Q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7EF3120311 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-17v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.241]) by resqmta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id kcvxhYnSX8rYLkdq9haVD5; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:18:37 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1562631517; bh=w/Twfst1/+5shfE3cRg0MEgngsOPok3OZyP4/mrbvos=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=5ltfZMuOxF9IFuk0I8Sq6t4U6dpNcf7RezmgpHslTrD4IXjCZSSYC91blTItvDgPw IoEI+ecdI0CXPtostoRCtc0BTeBeIWgT1nu7z1e9h8Z9OPkdBc95/chwZy+nua660u PLEz5jEr1po4Aqhu4C4b+4SNsMuVaUW22Jc6FyltmAgaZGYngi81C2KxfEuPHcn08d fcRHSN954SMrW0fUO+HEPVg7PUpAyO3dKWeO91OIc+J9rG2vINIIzQN9G5asHLoFb3 C9YpjfbgHuI1u4iTpFv9rS5Bcarxgx/U7K5pZM+FYGAyYIGhP7E6vRwpQGahxCpJvM K32NcMnob81Jg==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:1c79:26f2:cdcb:e51] ([IPv6:2601:152:4400:437c:1c79:26f2:cdcb:e51]) by resomta-po-17v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id kdq8hu6hYRbEbkdq8hq3go; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:18:37 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0;st=legit
Subject: Re: Posting and disclaimer (was Re: "Early rebid" (was Re: letters from Ted & Alissa))
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMCi=h1W15T-rt3MAu3NHBYdEaycUPw4XhRDBVNL4k_Xrg@mail.gmail.com> <BB4BA38F-B384-46A3-866C-4A61F4C7C681@sobco.com> <20190703221444.fvweit2qwmo5u4jp@mx4.yitter.info> <815cdd1d-c544-23a6-33ec-d8cff473f385@comcast.net> <20190704142321.3dcpdcvv2u37cpow@mx4.yitter.info> <9da5acd3-73ec-91fc-a855-af47e4f1bf89@comcast.net> <20190708204854.lwgb3kprazcq2ond@outlook.office365.com>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <4ec6574b-0c7f-c378-ed21-5e0871ad9e05@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 20:18:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190708204854.lwgb3kprazcq2ond@outlook.office365.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/gEKGInduXZtIpVCgxQS0i72dQF8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:18:53 -0000

On 7/8/2019 4:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Given the other comments I received on this topic, both on- and
> off-list, I respectfully thank you for this advice, but have decided
> to pursue a policy more in keeping with the one I posted last March.
> That is, when I think there is something I have to offer, which I
> expect to be rare, then I will offer it as an individual under the
> prevailing Internet Society policy on the matter.  If there is a
> policy to announce (like this), I will do so in my ISOC role.  I
> believe that this explicit attention to which hat someone is wearing
> has served our community well historically, and it is something many
> of us find we have to do more or less often.  I'd prefer not to create
> very different expectations for someone in this or that role.


Thanks for the response.  Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email