Posting and disclaimer (was Re: "Early rebid" (was Re: letters from Ted & Alissa))

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 04 July 2019 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F83C1206C3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 07:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=L05Qqnsr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=bkPmASlU
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaBkv_To3GM2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 07:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE22912007A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 07:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DB6BCCE6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:23:23 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1562250203; bh=wDw4lCK9to5061xVU77r47IgRUn0y0UfnhFQ9aGfvY4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L05QqnsrVUo3ENv9z4yrn7L70YnnGfohyUFdNdT3EKqtGRq+ua0nLevI5FQAx8sYM OkSfLfesx9HVuPloG9/nf7mdTUUd6c0CLE+2RS/nE0hqmDxv2iPFmFqGANH3ZAUGT8 C/FRJSqrv2jaxlrIRZzGGoRTAddZOQLXsOjCAy1c=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2VRi4FGURmL for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:23:22 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 10:23:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1562250202; bh=wDw4lCK9to5061xVU77r47IgRUn0y0UfnhFQ9aGfvY4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=bkPmASlUWdyUDQv3gvVmkQzNRXkLczvtByq95VQhaDgJGGk6I/BQKVI5WAPDz7P5h iZCbUdc48RNQQhLco8wJDH+DmwG0Vchn0d2pUJa2IQ/OnzTqLmfE2Na8IzMgNu1PRC NCnpqIQeDam0/LU6AeCSiaA4Uk3KzQO8+ofJLdYk=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Posting and disclaimer (was Re: "Early rebid" (was Re: letters from Ted & Alissa))
Message-ID: <20190704142321.3dcpdcvv2u37cpow@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <CA+9kkMCi=h1W15T-rt3MAu3NHBYdEaycUPw4XhRDBVNL4k_Xrg@mail.gmail.com> <BB4BA38F-B384-46A3-866C-4A61F4C7C681@sobco.com> <20190703221444.fvweit2qwmo5u4jp@mx4.yitter.info> <815cdd1d-c544-23a6-33ec-d8cff473f385@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <815cdd1d-c544-23a6-33ec-d8cff473f385@comcast.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/byRKSxeKj1XZo6b3ocovgyjpFFI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 14:24:03 -0000

Hi Mike,

For the record, I'm not exactly sure which hat I'm wearing at the
moment, but this message does contain a reference to an Internet
Society policy.

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 09:20:46AM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
> 
> It's pretty hard to not take the above with a grain of salt. You're not just
> an ISOC employee, but the president and CEO and as such have a lot of sway
> over the funding ISOC provides to the IETF.

Ok.  So, there are two possibilities:

1.  I continue to participate as an individual sometimes, in which
case I make the above disclaimer.  (See below for why.)

2.  I don't participate as an individual.

Are you advocating (2)?  I can see an argument for it, but it's not
entirely in keeping with the IETF traditions.  (Of course, those
traditions are not timeless, and there might be good reasons to change
them.)

> I can't remember Lynn or Cathy making a "not speaking for" statement in the
> time they were in your job, but this is the third from you in last day or
> so.

It was one of the "new rules" we adopted for Internet Society staff.
I announced them in March:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Ugu6O_5tCnNzTUmVzIuhNFKPzbE.
I'm not surprised that Lynn or Kathy didn't make such statements,
since they weren't operating under those rules.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com