IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: letters from Ted & Alissa

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 July 2019 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395861200C7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PA6pzcitQrhh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC07120651 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id k20so8188004ios.10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J5ZdUR4Qz9ejPsG7mBHqmbxRG0xdTp8sccEohpQDcHQ=; b=KWvNMnyo2nJGRTyo9UxDZta/ec/ZlkuNG9L3L/gklxrv96QdENGaLkmgVP4IQ/me83 aa98xXDmOwh0oyaKd2GCoArZYiGSDUy1AsB0Ik9KjURn4jb6pVi6ZsBg1t76crowZtq8 GqqEifhi2PBfTqgp8mJh2pHkDHMqGOmcoaglYTHfxvalj9sP35eUg6A+YS/XSYijxFBd BWa2e1eyxwGIK/cfBf1Wio22A8+7xShiAUGjqydlwUjLO+olK2VHHE40VUlcfALEQPOu eauai8x6V66TzsjFysbdOyD12zrS4CWQSpdP8+B9hFuAtcJE9lu3ZTzGrL4yvtUwD3vO 9e+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=J5ZdUR4Qz9ejPsG7mBHqmbxRG0xdTp8sccEohpQDcHQ=; b=UHhlusxOtf7C1FtakHVp/tKt22L+vqeuzdR9jjh1dGM1Wi98/bUexGriwKqn3zx4Kh HUrR8RjOdZ0xkMrf39Ex6fl2V2VrpafGBvzMPPLATw+701Adruob/Ff8gzTcd4oeSJLf 8Na93n0bSSiXh74+g5FZBfgcbviisFb+W9R2t19XueY2zWdzFXKTSuXOm8OnpjHE16mh cIkDZJ3O6tJRB7kLAUXtrAVfE/uMJJwMQNL0IU9i1HCIoT4B3vDfpXI6p7C2XM5to7yI YyRnEOe+HoVkL4h4cCWMJOYg3vMyxaYMnAclapn5v9fuBERtytrV8iKRXhHht/m/tddc hMTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX592OkKvT+ci6REtSlggKM0GiYBxIBewTZVVnc3ZL9iyHuCMxP P6K8y+9nYpNUNPWNEkOuCp5aeHTVdnA6QnMsNVNJNA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLuMw7yEeen67LQaanGAcYbRZ8Nbrz3QJOS26oxjcCvyDd2CCe+d40xmDW5CK4iLQVMM2flw5ydNz5AnS5E68=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:b10b:: with SMTP id r11mr43233645jah.140.1562188020433; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMCi=h1W15T-rt3MAu3NHBYdEaycUPw4XhRDBVNL4k_Xrg@mail.gmail.com> <BB4BA38F-B384-46A3-866C-4A61F4C7C681@sobco.com> <CA+9kkMDiXGce7bypYYtWxRxS6PLNUM_KYt6bmRMfx6hN8uK=+w@mail.gmail.com> <m2r276u956.wl-randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2r276u956.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 14:06:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBKbLNaytC7AaRn70eLUSO2NxwSNLrwOwxFt5JbjVvMbg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: letters from Ted & Alissa
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000007da79058ccd3e35"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/i2e3t3aaZcm-XgF3GqwBZB6Lp3I>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 21:07:03 -0000

On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:59 PM Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > I think there is an underlying structural problem in RFC 6635.  It
> > presents two different views of the RSE and those views have some
> > inherent conflicts.  One of those views is of a senior technical
> > contributor to the community who is expected to both manage the
> > evolution of the series and represent the value of the RFC series to
> > others.  The other view is of a contractor whose role is defined in a
> > set of contracts and extensions and who is overseen by a set of unpaid
> > volunteers.
>
> these are not in conflict, though they seem to be able to cause some
> confusion in the iab and rsoc.
>
> sometimes we have to pay senior professionals.  to do so, we often
> have contracts.  this does not make them fungible or less professional
> and deserving of serious respect.
>

I agree, and I thought my reference to Mike St. John's similar point made
that clear.  Sorry that it was not.

regards,

Ted



>
> randy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email