Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
"Rgd.ietf" <rgd.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 06 April 2014 01:27 UTC
Return-Path: <rgd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96341A0286 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 18:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ID44iMJkkshw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 18:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CC51A019B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 18:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v10so4950233pde.25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=VAK2IGSk/ZSaeZk6Vevll7//h5Bt0FPAdv2C9y+r6ak=; b=XJSHFQsoZplpit/kLnzbCsGSs/55g88eD+4hAjqaV+RZMLqVR4x4W4ULllO5bah3Nm WaQkvsmgVb+qNW+ZR4zoOZ2Owr4O9J7z2OI/IE0Z5EtEe9wtI91emXy77SRuxRfU2aAX +o5ycfK1/JYojGnSufyHgBSpRGMZy7R7v/OBEQTn2AvvDqBdduFvyXoU6eKlP76dKEDc 21aJQ44LA3PXrejc0uJSoQN/J98xCfLMCV4L7C3+8o/cgY3sDp5KUrg75Du4BzMSTmI+ m9XheKNzxma8YVzcmLmDYe4pXfC9+/Mp/WujfvMgFz40eCM23Ht7b4JHbUg2+A6gaJ13 vJ3A==
X-Received: by 10.66.146.229 with SMTP id tf5mr23392328pab.50.1396747639207; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.7] (cpe-142-136-145-221.socal.res.rr.com. [142.136.145.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pl10sm27111168pbb.56.2014.04.05.18.27.16 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20140401220040.F06667FC394@rfc-editor.org> <CAA=duU2cV0XLctSBeeW8OtXnCSYDGeWJUyv_uGT25V-4N+J8EA@mail.gmail.com> <1396395466.15324.6860.camel@mightyatom> <p06240603cf639ebf8c0d@[99.111.97.136]> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E779EEC0@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E779EEC0@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <6EC1F23D-F2ED-403B-9996-B897CC9CE5A1@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B651)
From: "Rgd.ietf" <rgd.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 18:27:15 -0700
To: "<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>" <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/OV5Bces8PXZ77i_BbnvwMVRkJ0Y
Cc: "<randy@qti.qualcomm.com>" <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 01:27:29 -0000
Bacterial issues almost seems like policy. Many users may desire bacterial enriched tea, the protocol should not enforce local policy, though it can present interfaces for policy application. > On Apr 5, 2014, at 5:41 PM, <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote: > > Look, if the water is not boiling, it may contain more bacteria, > with adverse effects on health. Boiling water properly > is most likely to kill that bacteria and prevent infection. > > Boiling the water is best practice, and you should use that > best practice even though you clearly don't understand why. > Trust us, you'll come to love it. It's for your own good. > > This is clearly another security threat to be prevented, and > the IETF's core work and primary focus is on mitigating > security threats that the IETF created in the first place. > > Boiling could have been mentioned in the security considerations > section. I see there's no mention of TLS or SHA or authenticating > commands either - so the IETF needs to set up a security group to > fix and properly secure HTCPCP-TEA immediately. > Documenting how everyone must always make tea will also be > a useful outcome of this group. > > get to it, Stephen! > > Lloyd Wood > http://about.me/lloydwood > ________________________________________ > From: ietf [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randall Gellens [randy@qti.qualcomm.com] > Sent: 04 April 2014 00:29 > To: Elwyn Davies; Andrew G. Malis > Cc: IETF Discussion > Subject: Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA) > > At 12:37 AM +0100 4/2/14, Elwyn Davies wrote: > >> We also need the internationalized version to cater for all those >> excellent varieties of China Tea. A nice drop of pu-erh perhaps? > > I stopped reading when I saw that there was no provision for handling > more delicate teas, just as Japanese sencha or gyokuro, which require > significantly cooler water and shorter brewing times. I'm not sure > I'd characterize this as a question of internationalization, since it > involves fundamental protocol elements and operation rather than user > display text. > > -- > Randall Gellens > Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only > -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- > The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it > has taken place. --G. B. Shaw >
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Elwyn Davies
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Tim Chown
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… John Levine
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Rgd.ietf
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Chaitanya Dhareshwar
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Yoav Nir
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Elwyn Davies
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Elwyn Davies
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Clint Chaplin
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… John C Klensin
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Brian E Carpenter
- Someone should do some work (was Re: RFC 7168 on … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Dale R. Worley
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Clint Chaplin
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Randall Gellens
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Randall Gellens
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Janet P Gunn
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Janet P Gunn
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… l.wood
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Rgd.ietf
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Randall Gellens
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… l.wood
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Ted Lemon
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… l.wood
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Randall Gellens
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… l.wood
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Dale R. Worley
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Randall Gellens
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… l.wood
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… Randall Gellens
- RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control… l.wood