IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Running code, take 2

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 December 2012 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282121F87F4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:48:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQFPNEb0pQ3U for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B7C21F87F2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:48:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d3so1802250lah.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:48:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cPAxbHxbnQD1kNjvhd2fk+au8lMGnoPGWrg4MGPXgJk=; b=gDet0oTCi5sw65GLXI+FWWyxU1KqWI2eMsWnO1dmoPS9BmE/yB1AH8DA1u3UJrgnWN e54GrRdCvpTHI8aunqyElutUe9+9pibLW4IE3qQX6ZkeE7ynqJwuTI91V5FCMhRkozlu 623Pg5xIn4hwzSdBCImjbu6kRwE78cKDp+HvN91gCsJO30NHctFeFz8mXgh1lgpj5x6O LTgstyzHwdUMmo+wdsdXOpDagQapN614tupuWPo3Z2Cx/9UM5gSaBkqsx1mN4fWxbjsa uVsZLAYbbCviUq1SQ6tUWcU82bzaCleWglCa2c/Cz3Kiu3CW7W0DZuAS4J+N1xScameE Lm6w==
Received: by 10.152.147.103 with SMTP id tj7mr292897lab.54.1355410086559; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.13] (85-250-110-45.bb.netvision.net.il. [85.250.110.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ja10sm746535lab.6.2012.12.13.06.48.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Dec 2012 06:48:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50C9EAA1.5070602@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:48:01 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Subject: Re: Running code, take 2
References: <50C8DB78.3080905@gmail.com> <50C9DED7.8060604@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <50C9DED7.8060604@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:48:08 -0000

Thanks Alessandro. I couldn't think of a specific count (10? 100?) for 
the success criteria, which is why the criteria are rather fuzzy. The 
experiment's summary report does promise to list adoption statistics.

Best,
	Yaron

On 12/13/2012 03:57 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Wed 12/Dec/2012 20:31:04 +0100 Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>>
>> I have just published a draft that proposes an alternative to
>> Stephen's "fast track". My proposal simply allows authors to document,
>> in a semi-standard way, whatever implementations exist for their
>> protocol, as well as their interoperability.
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-sheffer-running-code-00.txt
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I am looking forward to comments and discussion on this list.
>
> As an occasional I-D reader, I'd appreciate "Implementation Status"
> sections, including IPR info.  I don't think anything forbids to add
> such sections, if the authors wish.  I'd add a count of the number of
> I-Ds that actually have it among the experiment's success criteria.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email