Re: Running code, take 2

[Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>]

Hi Randy,

the RPKI report is very impressive and probably very useful. But:

- Other areas (e.g. the Security Area, where I'm coming form) may not 
have this tradition.

- For "smaller" protocols the gain does not justify the effort of 
writing a separate implementation report. A section in the base document 
is much simpler to maintain.

- And as I noted earlier on this thread, a wiki is a good alternative, 
provided everyone reading the base draft is referred to the 
"implementation status" wiki. They should not have to guess that one 
exists, or to search for it.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 12/13/2012 08:13 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> don't we already have a way of doing this?  implementation reports, e.g.
>
>      draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt
>
> a wiki can be more easily curated, though has authorization challenges.
>
> could you clue me into how the different modes would facilitate progress
> of the base document(s)?
>
> randy
>