IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCD312D674 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.187
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INZElB89m7Xw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E40F112D664 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=JcK-HP8200) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1bMgy2-000Nxp-VQ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:34:10 -0400
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:34:05 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Arkko Jari <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
Message-ID: <99B2D6A4AFD1ED6333D9332C@JcK-HP8200>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|da5a10cfc0197d092106b3d9438f7afbs6AKLf03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|42F9A871-3D50-4374-93C4-3B45A248C3ED@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com> <64DB4F404F7B3FD5A007BEA2@JcK-HP8200> <86428765-1C82-4434-B6DA-89E34DB599E2@piuha.net> <42F9A871-3D50-4374-93C4-3B45A248C3ED@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|da5a10cfc0197d092106b3d9438f7afbs6AKLf03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|42F9A871-3D50-4374-93C4-3B45A248C3ED@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XVd8OTiTCjLqUmslQHOFq8SpHOY>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 19:34:16 -0000


--On Monday, July 11, 2016 20:22 +0100 Tim Chown
<tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

>> On 11 Jul 2016, at 19:07, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I have some personal opinions about these things, but
>> ultimately, what does the community want to do?
> 
> Can we make sure this question is asked explicitly in the
> post-meeting survey? That would allow feedback to be collated
> in an efficient way.

Remember that post-meeting surveys historically do not reach
anyone who does not attend in person.  To the extent to which
this is ultimately a strategic decision that affects the
community (and, to some extent, who can participate effectively
in the IETF), everyone needs to be asked (and, as Dave Crocker
points out, asking in a plenary doesn't do the job either0.

    john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email