Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 03 June 2015 09:21 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF601B36AF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 02:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OW8nC-M1YjWU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 02:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0AE91B36BB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 02:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=595; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1433323259; x=1434532859; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rh3Qy5ySwW5evjQJBdlZcIRp720nVso5Dqq4gFmFsmY=; b=Z4gr41xWoMw4vZQsjJjCL9/cnYqOgndIkGgiag2hoUgV4lWJKaqbPs0o cZHkcv6ulQkLRlWqkWvf9oYkKlJ5jfvMTWmgG06oZ1pcNp3fqZamwSIAd lZSgIMoNkWjKJEPDxIKnCyu/ETLo3oT4RqNZfTYkYTdazIzHLEJ98Z1OP M=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,546,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="504662396"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2015 09:20:55 +0000
Received: from [64.103.106.148] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-148.cisco.com [64.103.106.148]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t539KtLi018650; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 09:20:55 GMT
Message-ID: <556EC6F9.9010801@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:20:57 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"
References: <20150601164359.29999.35343.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL02cgRPFooA5fVFwvdprb3wPD+Y55pD+7RWjkACDv7T_TBW5Q@mail.gmail.com> <556DE0EF.2040809@isi.edu> <FE9A2408-555C-4B06-9009-D6C1D93356B4@nominum.com> <556DF072.4030202@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <556DF072.4030202@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Y931beti1weHtXcEJP34HpdlXao>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 09:21:00 -0000

On 02/06/2015 19:05, Joe Touch wrote:
>
> On 6/2/2015 11:02 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
>>> Leaving out the have-nots - or those whose access is blocked by others
>>> when content cannot be scanned - isn't moving forward.
>> That would certainly be a problem if the consensus were not to
>> provide both a secure and an, as you call it, "open" version of all IETF documents.
> The IETF is more than just the documents.
>
> All IETF content should be accessible via non-secure means.
>
> Joe
>
>
s/should/MUST/

Stewart