Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 01 June 2015 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312BD1A1B5D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h0NKi_QFmLRu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a110.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D9A1A1B0C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a110.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a110.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D4D2005E808; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=EncBKEy9WOE1sY dtpllUjCM010U=; b=rRc0K697GBFG1KgbjLxx+YL/7iIrFxubtnEXAlGbfjZqd1 wppaTfJ3L02qbw+tEDwlx97ofpCZQC/Qs2rXLg0deIZFtcz3ibYubjvp4FaVinjL G5FFacWLPNP2L9JEW1ubEZrWeUdRVf/HSuPvLi5vDLiNLo3ZEiPkrZajxPXHU=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a110.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B7DF2005E804; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:22:08 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@arbor.net>
Subject: Re: Proposed Statement on "HTTPS everywhere for the IETF"
Message-ID: <20150601232208.GE17122@localhost>
References: <20150601164359.29999.35343.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL02cgRPFooA5fVFwvdprb3wPD+Y55pD+7RWjkACDv7T_TBW5Q@mail.gmail.com> <1472054.O9DP0qoCQf@gongo> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1506011720390.12155@bofh.nohats.ca> <556CE3C1.5000407@cs.tcd.ie> <B6A87923-FDEF-4F98-85F7-8264620DAA3E@arbor.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B6A87923-FDEF-4F98-85F7-8264620DAA3E@arbor.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/PX6BtfEE8UssiMwuj51w6rHPni4>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 23:22:11 -0000

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 06:00:42AM +0700, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> On 2 Jun 2015, at 5:59, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> > Changes like using https by default have much broader justifications.
> 
> They also have much broader objections.

Broad enough to stop the IETF from making the statement we're
discussing?  Your objections w.r.t. DoS attack characterization are
hardly "broad" enough.

Nico
--