Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Tue, 06 May 2014 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D671A041A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 17:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.281
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7jhBxUXv7yX for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 17:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792341A03EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 17:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB82CC096 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:27:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NITqTFwRVv0L for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Miles-Fidelmans-MacBook-Pro.local (static-173-56-67-50.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [173.56.67.50]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17FE9CC095 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <53682C4B.80301@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 20:26:51 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
References: <28671EE8-A8B9-40D1-9268-527A8FFC34AD@cisco.com> <53682B10.2070000@meetinghouse.net> <1BB8A9AB-C7C1-4959-B8C2-C649AB4EA19D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BB8A9AB-C7C1-4959-B8C2-C649AB4EA19D@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZZXln9xIxpYdDRKxhqWid4LnUkc
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 00:27:05 -0000

Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> On May 5, 2014, at 5:21 PM, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
>
>> Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>>> We have been having a fairly extended discussion, much of which seems hypothetical - “I don’t like DEMARC because I am worried that ... with mailing lists”. I wonder if we could take a moment to try it and see what happens?
>>>
>>>
>> Ummm..... yahoo changed their dmarc policy to p=reject, lots of mailing lists broke.  What experiment is it that you think we need to run?
> I guess we’re running it. I was hoping to avoid the “everything around broke” part.

Well.. I can certainly tell you that, as someone who supports a couple 
of dozen email lists, an awful lot broke - both for my users (who shared 
their pain with me) and for me, as an administrator. Lots of things 
stopped working, for lots of people, overnight - to me that fits the 
definition of "broke."

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra