IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 03 May 2014 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DD11A6EF1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 17:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1M54EYkMVHH0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 17:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CAB1A6FF1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 17:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 96213 invoked from network); 3 May 2014 00:33:16 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=177d4.5364394c.k1405; bh=2zA2lFhgCNyEVVrtMpW6L3l4DLl6BTLHbu8kxc7jNWM=; b=JCGDmN1MCPEvXZ7YyIecNrV3iCiskFfr9jfOVbwTmzvs6LBmMSCY1k851oUiCsBVocUEq0GCQAH5GBAl0uYf9tfby0DBPiN6plbZQkrY/qnoOMIsCyO9xpAkJyq0Z4lzlvwVegdF/vRKLr11x4GkEfNu6D03QCDGluUPj7juatRhV1izx7q7qUAjW7Az3C2WkcsSz1SNyOmFsYolW/c07HIS2HXKx3Bgphrd3eOHgD2IxJelXssjwGm44SoLzhe7
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=177d4.5364394c.k1405; bh=2zA2lFhgCNyEVVrtMpW6L3l4DLl6BTLHbu8kxc7jNWM=; b=m0bdf/iFfBielv+YCbgCLjjYVwA9phSbXXtUX7A7g6TlNlSmTmEk4jOhNGcvSKpXYyllakPNHrCvGrVZ8upc4CXzKhHz5rrwkSxDPgRnAmANEBZU7WNpME6mZfpqU6+uP40L2XFnAElapMxjN4sDLeEc7+QS/SgAZY3C0vYLZ4XsCYOA1z526qTKJ0d7bZEW73SogE5Ml2ftv41DcLpgdGbWOjI/E00qOF+ns21u7Ng2VRv1HHY8dMiTaoHaTnCQ
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 03 May 2014 00:33:16 -0000
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 20:33:15 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405022032220.11447@joyce.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
In-Reply-To: <20140502233527.GC24108@thunk.org>
References: <20140502211317.81216.qmail@joyce.lan> <E32E56A1-F404-489B-96F5-FCF335BFD57A@cisco.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1405021731280.81340@joyce.lan> <20140502233527.GC24108@thunk.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r-pLE25pYa9bmzLepAtZPIiv4OA
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 00:33:21 -0000

> If you think about the inventives of the entities in question, it's
> really not that surprising.  Yahoo and AOL will want to force people
> to use their web-based forums, ...

In this case, I find ineptness as least as plausible as malice:

http://jl.ly/Email/aoldmarc.html

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email