IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Tue, 06 May 2014 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6D61A0106 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 17:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_16=0.6, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B5bUyEc7-jm3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 May 2014 17:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6001A0045 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 17:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8B7CC096 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 8Y45Z3PraSVr for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Miles-Fidelmans-MacBook-Pro.local (static-173-56-67-50.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [173.56.67.50]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03848CC095 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:21:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <53682B10.2070000@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 20:21:36 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a mailing list?
References: <28671EE8-A8B9-40D1-9268-527A8FFC34AD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <28671EE8-A8B9-40D1-9268-527A8FFC34AD@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4BeIb3NUFTOxKgvMjcgBnBPfjGw
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 00:21:50 -0000

Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> We have been having a fairly extended discussion, much of which seems hypothetical - “I don’t like DEMARC because I am worried that ... with mailing lists”. I wonder if we could take a moment to try it and see what happens?
>
>
Ummm..... yahoo changed their dmarc policy to p=reject, lots of mailing 
lists broke.  What experiment is it that you think we need to run?

Miles Fidelman

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email