Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 20 September 2018 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7F1130EA3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WxaHJz4ShXvu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F20F130DE2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 05:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:50114) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1g2yQN-000Nkl-hL (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:51:15 +0100
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 13:51:15 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>
cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
In-Reply-To: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809201347140.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cVDRA99UVKG0Em4im-WoqltyyCQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:51:19 -0000

A lot of this problematic terminology is metaphorical in some way. If you
strive to use descriptive terms, rather than metaphorical terms, then you
should end up with language that is more straightforward and clear.

For example, block list / allow list.

Primary / replica. Source / sink. Upstream / downstream.

Active interception / passive snooping.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Hebrides, Bailey: Cyclonic, becoming north or northwest, 5 to 7, occasionally
gale 8 at first in Hebrides. Rough or very rough, occasionally moderate in
Hebrides. Squally showers. Good, occasionally moderate.