IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Thu, 05 March 2015 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2D31A036F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:29:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hal5o-u0Sja7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10F91A038B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:29:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.138] (frobbit.cust.teleservice.net [85.30.128.225]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A69562042B; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:29:20 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_10F90AE2-8447-4DFE-9A72-59D3191E6E5A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b5
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <3FD8A0A3-5E71-483E-89FF-545120EE763C@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 06:29:20 +0100
Message-Id: <600A7186-7454-4FF7-981E-B170A58F212C@frobbit.se>
References: <54C9DA42.5040901@cisco.com> <9EB44D8A-278B-42FC-A542-1C182AD43128@netnod.se> <A74A30F4D1214630918FD4CA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20150223153757.GI1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20150223155241.GJ1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tsl8ufoh9ko.fsf@mit.edu> <2DF7230C-D1D8-4B21-9003-B336108A38CB@vpnc.org> <20150224172649.GX1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tslvbircj0d.fsf@mit.edu> <0325DF3F-17F3-4400-BDEA-EDB5334BF35C@frobbit.se> <20150225180227.GT1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <7AB921D35A7F9B23A53BD11A@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <tslvbip8io6.fsf@mit.edu> <54F09A35.9060506@qti.qualcomm.com> <54F78650.6070503@qti.qualcomm.com> <3FD8A0A3-5E71-483E-89FF-545120EE763C@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/cyfj96DbbMq8nD2mnAS85zjZtug>
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 05:29:24 -0000

All, specifically Mark,

This was a stupid editorial mistake by myself. It should have been replaced. So much for merging documents when being too tired 23:00 in the evening on the day the AD had given me a deadline... My apologies.

Pete, please let me know when you want a new version, -13.txt

   Patrik

> On 5 mar 2015, at 00:41, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pete,
> 
> The example still uses a Web home page, even though this use of the URI record isn't specified nor used by any implementation I'm aware of (and even if there were one, it wouldn't be interoperable).
> 
> Changing to another example would fix this.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
>> On 5 Mar 2015, at 9:25 am, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> [Explicitly Cc'ing folks who participated in the thread.]
>> 
>> On 2/27/15 10:24 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>> I'm going to ask Patrik to publish a revised ID at this point, which I expect to see in the next couple of days.
>> 
>> The new version of the document (-12) is out, announcement attached. It is now Informational, it removes the discussion of flag "D" for NAPTR, and adds a bit of discussion to security considerations. I would appreciate folks giving it a sniff and making sure it addresses your earlier concerns. If so, I'll go ahead and ballot it for the 12-March IESG telechat.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> pr
>> 
>> --
>> Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
>> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
>> 
> <Attached Message.eml>
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email