IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 11 July 2016 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D638D12D1A1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmrMG84l2yhj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (unknown [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA74312D192 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.234] (no-dns-yet.convergencegroup.co.uk [46.255.117.114] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u6BE0rt2019981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 07:00:54 -0700
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <5EA6A07F-EE58-4F39-8502-A4FA1282E954@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CAG4d1rcr3Yk4iR5Q0o9vyvR7COOY+qaW2C63TM-vkaXAkqYMvQ@mail.gmail.com> <EMEW3|0308d300610c0123df56a7ee21b1b33es6AEmw03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5EA6A07F-EE58-4F39-8502-A4FA1282E954@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CAPt1N1mRvYfx-vHYvi_QqvLtOME9wBL5Vxa+vk0iMxk_eJ05yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <0554af35-05d9-5661-16b8-9009f49845b7@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:00:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mRvYfx-vHYvi_QqvLtOME9wBL5Vxa+vk0iMxk_eJ05yg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/j_FJhV-z5xglY9c_l0rQZTzv5x0>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:00:58 -0000

On 7/11/2016 2:54 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> So on the one hand, I think this was pre-discussed.


I thought that IETF decisions were supposed to be made online and that 
what takes place at the f2f meeting is preliminary, not final...

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email