IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)

Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se> Sat, 25 September 2004 09:27 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA14578; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CB8x7-0008A2-Tf; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:34:50 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CB8lx-0005s5-1H; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:23:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CB8k5-0005Ue-3w for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:21:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA14320 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:21:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp1.su.se ([130.237.162.112]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CB8rF-00083X-HQ for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:28:46 -0400
Received: from localhost (smtp1.su.se [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5711B382AA; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp1.su.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.su.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19779-01-77; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.0.0.30] (1-1-2-20a.rny.sth.bostream.se [82.182.132.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B4E380E3; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:21:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <41553888.4080609@it.su.se>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:21:12 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@it.su.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913
X-Accept-Language: sv, en, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409232031350.15671-100000@netcore.fi> <200409231805.i8NI5RAx082574@calcite.rhyolite.com>
In-Reply-To: <200409231805.i8NI5RAx082574@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at su.se
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> 
> 
> Who said anything about necessary state and reasonable timeouts?  I've
> seen more than one brand of consumer-grade box with NAT features that
> could not be turned off, and that even in their most permissive settings
> kill ssh sessions after an hour or two whether the ssh sessions had
> been active or not.

I have one that shot down my ssh sessions after 5 minutes of aparent
inactivity - "Hey this tcp session hasn't seen any pr0n in 5 minutes.
It must be a stalled http. Let's kill it!" This is a *major* supplier
of soho equipment. Moreover it was clear from the support-forum that
this was a concious choice. The question is what effect a BCP from the
BEHAVE-wg would have. Personally I am an optimist.
	
	Cheers Leif

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email