IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5063A081C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=XEYZJw4D; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=arrUJ1nK
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBRdaRMQnMyl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66F63A080E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 40374 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2020 22:57:16 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=9db4.5f2b394c.k2008; bh=pY/NG1oeMz5pU3d1GYGhfVnEBMy1LYlYpwqE/gd9ptc=; b=XEYZJw4DtVdu8o56XWdAf4ZE0c6YYHIgEmfSO44d1KVSSEdfqmPnmWzlF0xw2YHVeV0bVgn7enxuSFYihzc8J2UXLSNIk/kQu2pkPwDZd+xzpti7y1hER4kmTM1PUZRC9foV22H3K/6w3TDwQpcF8k/txhBsthKyORIJUnaCJwn7SDXGUttn8/8F6g98KirDoplYoP5rmTO2N9K1F8jf5VbdTWtBBojMihC4zn9Q0HD09lL6peuj8qYEvauOTCibwZDNq0xRTd7Vv6CvTKdAQ+vlAKy9xhAAV+z40M5oBBk0/5dhj2iv5eG7eY35QbuAZW+JYqr5TUX0K2CMjj1CiQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=9db4.5f2b394c.k2008; bh=pY/NG1oeMz5pU3d1GYGhfVnEBMy1LYlYpwqE/gd9ptc=; b=arrUJ1nKmcDMX2pveUnzDEIn0Vupw2sbmsRbZ/yXMsaST5hzd8xqwdZRUs3uaVUQ5Wj1CdtEvI7J0t/3JbWsJ1JijzvutmKgRlI1949rCtTQYhc6zmqlyqwGX2+SkWR606bW5ODJjmgy+8AOjGv+voIghSv4HZuuHvcV13Qw6C7ECeo3eQhLT+WegEmkM/vvI45m+7fYTk4Wsd8WpR2KKHnrse8S/BwxyZrNccZ9d+OOH3A04oZ2ZwI3evA3UJjVtbNqG4xaQJ03ctXvMQomMC+D2bdCt+Zqv2JOl/OJL6a4qqdiJlC2/60Ypyi4UHmmb1matLNEwgdrCXfZW8PjNQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 05 Aug 2020 22:57:16 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id AAF6C1E04CC5; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 18:57:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 18:57:15 -0400
Message-Id: <20200805225715.AAF6C1E04CC5@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Manycouches] IETF Slack workspace
In-Reply-To: <20200805140637.E25A7DFC@m0117566.ppops.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/r5vxxZcw1erS-yMjVkgJYe2KpPc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 22:57:19 -0000

In article <20200805140637.E25A7DFC@m0117566.ppops.net> you write:
>Since no one else answered, I will.  I was on it just to see how it
>worked.  A few newbies said hello.  Some minor discussions and some 
>funny stuff (In #random someone sent 106bLo0fZflMnnMlsBYNA36WZVvr 
>and a short discussion started about /dev/urandom) happened.  All
>in all I didn't see too much going on when compared to the mailing 
>list activity.

I used it too, not much happened.

The practical advantage of slack over jabber is that the client can
follow multiple conversations at once much better than most jabber
clients.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email