Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>
Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 21 June 2012 10:34 UTC
Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A5621F859B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RNhCryr6nHmm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6130121F8599 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so266297vbb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FZ/Y5W9qYQFQQwWfnapdnsDNe3DEjiVBByIWwmPDudg=; b=AQG5VugRebKLem+TepK3EwKlfhNPpO3IyscO2uP/fO0U576nOzErj6qYLefD8zff/P cjV0mknwel88BjnQCrkPp2gepQumd56t0n6ZlqpP7A3o0uk+0A14URY/JIVd845rNQRg YPIofhGxX1cUnux38ajAtjp3CYm2/B5P5o3rqCjJnbO5SmI1/2tu+9c8lNG6vb37itQt vgcriy3GhTPOHrAd8ylYbhdsBqS81lxTpkwLQwQlTxbPFMrVa3IMo7MthU395/1RgTNe Ks3yfspmaMgPLSwi3RF8xx5FRVgXjDdzYMvVnlYmJboY6LNrES1YAIxd8+H4FwLu7RrI 7u2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.149.15 with SMTP id r15mr13416031vcv.1.1340274893561; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.211.72 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ8-kndVu9=4hG=hKPuTu960gEorac2w5gO6XJaL96gGrJA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADnDZ89XGzmqRTL61rc9MSYRJCjs3BgwSDcM=J+_sKvoR1muEw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88jqzUpFwkyr9rtGQsoq3fNea_j-g2wpfz2081VrUakZg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89fxJo_YbVMrVr+-Q_-nF72W9iG9vZapZNV+1O0gckpow@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120620072437.0ad66a00@resistor.net> <CADnDZ8-kndVu9=4hG=hKPuTu960gEorac2w5gO6XJaL96gGrJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:34:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-01L10ywMfW=2N90AnQRv2U3Vhp=qgJtpRL5KAgC=8XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: SM <sm@resistor.net>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:34:55 -0000
Hi All Discussing the draft <draft-hoffman-tao-as-web-page-02> >Can you say what was "not so clear"? I absolutely want that bit to be clear. Proposed text is appreciated here. -Why the document/draft does not mention/reference other descriptive related works? -Why the document/draft obsoletes RFC4677, is there a big reason? -Why is the document/draft not clear of its aim, objectives, sub-process-periods, and update-announcement-procedure? In the introduction> [This document contains the procedure agreed to by the IESG. The Tao has traditionally been an IETF consensus document,..] -Why the document/draft in section 2 does not mention consesus while mentioned in introduction. -Why the document/draft does not include section about the Tao-list and this discussion method and purposes. -Why the document/draft has one section after the introduction, avoiding important sections like in RFC2418 (WG procedures) or as: a) Roles of Tao-webpage update. b) Roles of Individual submission to Editor. c) The community input to the webpage. d) What is the Editor criteria of accepting and refusing such updates. >Earlier versions of the Tao were made obsolete, not moved to Historic, so I thought it was most appropriate to do that here as well. FWIW, the definition of "Historic" in RFC 2026 is for specifications, not descriptive documents like the Tao. Yes the early versions were obsoleted by a new RFC, not obsoleted by RFC-that-references-webpage. I am not against the webpage, but against to obsolete RFC4677. There should be a way to make one Tao RFC alive while having the webpage. Maybe this I-D can update RFC4677 to add the possibility of both RFC and webpage. >I'll +0 the draft to avoid changing the state of consensus. I agree and want the *consesus* and *community* input to be clear in the draft I hope my message language is good/ok to understand, if not please advise and I will send another clarification, Regards AB ==================================================
- Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the I… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Barry Leiba
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Melinda Shore
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… SM
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Paul Hoffman
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… SM
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Melinda Shore
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Russ Housley
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… SM
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Abdussalam Baryun
- bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors hawk… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors … Russ Housley
- RE: bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors … Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors … Russ Housley
- Re: bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors … Joel jaeggli
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Julian Reschke
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Russ Housley
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Julian Reschke
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Russ Housley
- Re: bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors … John Levine
- Re: bits-n-bites: Exhibitors and product vendors … joel jaeggli
- Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of t… Tony Hansen