Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AD121F85EF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkgYA2q0R0pR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FCE21F8546 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vbbez10 with SMTP id ez10so721232vbb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pjd900O/vuxUYh9t60Gs0umqEqobrjsIQWBIGsfLqqg=; b=M/FJBhkPX0toKAQMQfPc2D0gWnxjIt7OLb692XQY+/1ogh1+ubE9mcG/LJQMfPX3mh Y+WG31q14Xv8NvUF9FxVe7vEtV3N9hCRorAJf6PEsR+i/ODXbeM9WM8eAw6iHSG9WOiF C69uziSjZ9W/WqxB3iBtVKc6yNv2OpPR2WR3wUpFfQTEmnCMmvIGOK9u0MxTqEbSPqOW erdb0vzGPSWF95+RLs4eWkVBM8HBySktwTi3Fjq8B9CBdJlcYRv5GYVXCiGV+wnTl+s5 cCuB2VSIBXZcsiNQ0MKJSxDpvTd/4FioxDxUMjhi9hkfhsJ1PQIPux+lzwy2dMjpo1my VG/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.90.196 with SMTP id by4mr68297vdb.103.1340327551952; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.211.72 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120621085050.0a2e1a60@resistor.net>
References: <CADnDZ89XGzmqRTL61rc9MSYRJCjs3BgwSDcM=J+_sKvoR1muEw@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ88jqzUpFwkyr9rtGQsoq3fNea_j-g2wpfz2081VrUakZg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ89fxJo_YbVMrVr+-Q_-nF72W9iG9vZapZNV+1O0gckpow@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120620072437.0ad66a00@resistor.net> <CADnDZ8-kndVu9=4hG=hKPuTu960gEorac2w5gO6XJaL96gGrJA@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-01L10ywMfW=2N90AnQRv2U3Vhp=qgJtpRL5KAgC=8XQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120621085050.0a2e1a60@resistor.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:12:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ881q6ztP+cDsnF5pajjFQg+Pd6k+iPQyW2pnVpiWNdpCA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: housley@vigilsec.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:12:33 -0000

Hi Russ,

I agree with the proposal totally, but my confusions are: a) if we are
having the current document RFC4677 on the Tao-web, could we not
obsolete the RFC4677 until we get a final updated agreed RFC other
than the submitted I-D, Or the first web-document approved to obsolete
the RFC4677.
b) If we are making a new IETF web-document process, could we have the
I-D submited to include how the community will decide and how the
editor will decide.

sorry for any disturb,

Abdussalam
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>
To: IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:08:40 -0400

This URL <http://www.ietf.org/tao> will bring up the current document.
 It works exactly the same as <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>.

This means that <http://www.ietf.org/tao/archive> cannot be used as
suggested on this thread.

I propose the following URLs for the Tao:

   - current Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>

   - draft Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-possible-revision.html>

   - archive entries: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-archive/tao-YYYYMMDD.html>

Russ