Re: [Int-area] [arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

On 27/2/20 22:05, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Fernando said:
> 
> "May I ask what is the point of bothering publishing specs if they are
> going to be violated at will *within the same organization that
> published the specs*."
> 
> [BA] The point of publishing specifications is to make them available 
> for evaluation and potential implementation.  It's a contribution to the 
> "marketplace of ideas". 

It would seem to me there's much more than that.

If that were the case, anything and everything would be published as an RFC.

Among other things, the specs we publish are supposed to be subject to a 
decent level of review, and are also supposed to be coherent groups of 
specifications.

If you have one spec that says one thing, and then you have another, 
from the same Std Org, that says the opposite, without "obsoleting" the 
former, then you end up with something that won't have a single bit of 
coherence, virtually impossible to digest by anybody else other by than 
a limited group of people that just happens to know how everyone 
violates each others specs.


Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492