Re: [Internetgovtech] draft-iab-iana-framework-02 (was Re: IANA changes

[Jefsey <[e-mail]>]

At 10:29 02/04/2014, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>On 2 apr. 2014, at 07:28, Abdussalam Baryun 
><<mailto:[e-mail]>[e-mail]> wrote:
>In all honesty, with this document I've have shifted between forward 
>thinking and setting a baseline for discussion, currently the 
>document is more about the latter.
>>
>>I will review the draft and comment here, hope that is related to 
>>list purpose. Thanks.
>Yes, it is related to the list. Thanks for willing to spend cycles.

Olaf,

one of the concern that is alluded to in Abdussalam's mail is the 
difficulty to understand where (and therefore what) is the action and 
target, with so many lists. The IETF is an ISOC affiliate. ISOC has a 
list called "IANAxfer". I think we would need to know if one of the 
options that is investigated is the transfer back/consolidation of 
the IANA as an ISOC affiliate. I do not advocate it, but I 
acknowledge that the ISOC consistency and legitimacy in terms of 
international trust are probably better than ICANN.

Also, on a (different?) issue, if you consider the Contributors and 
Acknowledgemetns list, I do not note any citizen from the countries 
which have signed the WCIT. My understanding is that, the WCIT 
disagreement being over the internet, the NTIA move is a step toward 
a compromise acceptable on both sides. Any reach out idea into that 
direction? I ask myself if that issue is really different because 
ISOC has national chapters, i.e. IETF has direct colleagues on both "sides".

Best
jfc