IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] draft-iab-iana-framework-02 (was Re: IANA changes

Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl> Wed, 02 April 2014 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4301A016C for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 01:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.915
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IXr6Pe2ggNQz for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 01:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open.nlnetlabs.nl (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6511A008E for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a04:b900::d0ea:e8e8:e6b7:e1a4] ([IPv6:2a04:b900::d0ea:e8e8:e6b7:e1a4]) (authenticated bits=0) by open.nlnetlabs.nl (8.14.7/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s328TgXJ088392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:29:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olaf@NLnetLabs.nl)
Authentication-Results: open.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=none header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 open.nlnetlabs.nl s328TgXJ088392
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1396427386; bh=OgYcYCsqp7grHlhCUyQ4CnaJA2p4vFgy+xNE6fKlMAo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=dvlnZ6JM1mTke9x2P9YkM5DxPbnPiHYyJaAFANgaqzP5wSsny8qDXfCxiF2vGKuBm 8qFx+HidX5STQe9/ET7cwwixTmRpNqBciMnUg7b2UHtg7YXfi/qV/Eskfpq5XI68Fn Mx7cbyMldp7A2T3DcttAEdl41PklczuEDIQYGJCo=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BAB66446-A862-46F0-9640-6AEBC8B4745C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Olaf Kolkman <olaf@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ88-MdhnP0cithbGCdNjE-NGz43GgyBksRxtRBJv-a+vPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:29:41 +0200
Message-Id: <427FB5CE-1782-4652-B51C-1BE059509820@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <CADnDZ88-MdhnP0cithbGCdNjE-NGz43GgyBksRxtRBJv-a+vPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (open.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:206:1::53]); Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:29:44 +0200 (CEST)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/t7pKnIIwZO7ScNtZ6KNrsnyu1Lg
Cc: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] draft-iab-iana-framework-02 (was Re: IANA changes
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 08:29:58 -0000


Dear Abdussalam,

On 2 apr. 2014, at 07:28, Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:

> The draft of the IAB IANA program does the describing of IANA which is very important in these days of discussing IANA future. However, I suggest that its introduction show the current situation and the possible future summary change of discussions in IAB. 

Thanks for your suggestion.

The draft as it is now is consciously only describing the framework and the principles for how to apply that framework. It intends to provide a common language. The Discussion section makes the case that the framework does apply to the situation today and that the framework allows for evolution.

In all honesty, with this document I've have shifted between forward thinking and setting a baseline for discussion, currently the document is more about the latter.


> I will review the draft and comment here, hope that is related to list purpose. Thanks. 
> 

Yes, it is related to the list. Thanks for willing to spend cycles.


Kind regards,

—Olaf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email