IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Internetgovtech] draft-iab-iana-framework-02 (was Re: IANA changes

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 03 April 2014 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC8C1A002A for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGy5L_Bj7_yh for <internetgovtech@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x235.google.com (mail-yh0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8B51A0048 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v1so1039130yhn.40 for <internetgovtech@iab.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5dBnxxiRUwe0ye1GTAf152vuFbb7nq8CwFS0tw4iqHs=; b=ZWoeIuyO5lYOOSITEZpNIELbE6yVL5922j14xP88fJJrsy4ExWg7XZVCiKXDYV/qUD jW6zSfUXMVXWevvLvlzDQtWobh/m/kD8IdB7bcB74gVh2FjgghRH0RirAFDX6W0mTGNN LIOFrfvE/+YusjTK3CHhMq1WrZmDeNBtLuaM0iOJ6gpzsSJ75+9mqcgLm+Mj11+uIQG9 WDp6ZogyiULgWWvfCCspNtGsZY59iko/Wr/EVh1JSfMRxTfb9tO7CFLjxPgLefx5R4rj 0gzJg6r7CqOlqGgkfU1JkuRT+SMtlUmpBGhR4Y6m4XTnDR1HO2zM3UJtIU9oet+niI4t nHnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.8.68 with SMTP id 44mr4928920yhq.39.1396487986555; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.87.135 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 18:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <533c5050.036e0e0a.52c7.6445SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
References: <CADnDZ88-MdhnP0cithbGCdNjE-NGz43GgyBksRxtRBJv-a+vPA@mail.gmail.com> <427FB5CE-1782-4652-B51C-1BE059509820@NLnetLabs.nl> <533c5050.036e0e0a.52c7.6445SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 02:19:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-uxuHED8e3dcC3BHCn50xpUJ__t4XShjhZdaaXQjP8Bg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01634e405f4b4904f619327c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/internetgovtech/YEVqjzJ_eRhhlBDSR5pPTfaHAuo
Cc: "internetgovtech@iab.org" <internetgovtech@iab.org>
Subject: Re: [Internetgovtech] draft-iab-iana-framework-02 (was Re: IANA changes
X-BeenThere: internetgovtech@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Governance and IETF technical work <internetgovtech.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.iab.org/mail-archive/web/internetgovtech/>
List-Post: <mailto:internetgovtech@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/internetgovtech>, <mailto:internetgovtech-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 01:19:56 -0000

On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, Jefsey wrote:

>
> Olaf,
>
> one of the concern that is alluded to in Abdussalam's mail is the
> difficulty to understand where (and therefore what) is the action and
> target, with so many lists. The IETF is an ISOC affiliate. ISOC has a list
> called "IANAxfer". I think we would need to know if one of the options that
> is investigated is the transfer back/consolidation of the IANA as an ISOC
> affiliate. I do not advocate it, but I acknowledge that the ISOC
> consistency and legitimacy in terms of international trust are probably
> better than ICANN.
>

I agree, a society is more about the people and ISOC is giving chance to
people to participate in internet technology. In the future I think
that IANA should be with IAB and ISOC. I think Jon Postel also wanted more
society into that new body of IANA but I still reading history (not easy to
find real history these days :-)

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email