IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for STAMP Extensions

Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 06 June 2020 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1573E3A0941 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 05:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LUiSbIDu4y-j for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 05:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63E63A095B for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 05:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id z206so7438116lfc.6 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 05:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+zXza3DZjyJpQPrZDGIBzhj31kS0OCYz1jVx8XCbypQ=; b=BTQmHXgNckyLwVFFuBb3LNE/XX2nb2qGP4eIM1qDakwj4jNGWcH8IQWKa4yNkh2M8i xSqm5Zn3xbCBXM5afnQHUFtqf6mndT5cTzxBeL75zhOTESG2CI64o89XcPi0m1wWOjJT KwBrGKl8YkWTNIgdF4DHv6DnDV6q5jtLy4h9ugu6046sG9c35iukXAKkAKjNDLaei2sD 4jALo9HFPCoDI04ysP/n5ZeFJaEW8xYKvcnBNUk8Kwn41B+kXcTxh7is9CRDyXxDbtYv /py/T/7RDC3+Zisz+tfvUmW8a+V4PTUp/ZoGNgivxUYe2P6R5pOv6SEIJIodPHNfyPo8 x+Wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+zXza3DZjyJpQPrZDGIBzhj31kS0OCYz1jVx8XCbypQ=; b=JcCXAfRg44TqGGuF7iJVxJ61VBjI11J2aWr2s8Be/v6InumzoNI74xiRNwQMMzHAhA tP/xINQ34Hkd5TUWbWTles969sD2hA012LqbeiB74kfnULo6rD0fCKlfuIFAMM4HSKDT Mszkph4OzlBfaUgZGsWwVJq+hDYUnNV6RwQldMkcLaNYBmC4Yt+BYloLiBJJ4Yadnp5j C3UK9mXaupXFfAeFaort0SYGv5WfDJHlvQmF/lhXl3E+QA5geS8USEcc/q2ON5hjRxgb J4W3lqX2WeFvCz9i1lL8o6Il3WX1ovV3FXnR2d8GNRFI51ddciYomfiSgCqP5/ubDPAR Ukqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fmX7M7j39N2dbiGxsqzdVZ6Lr0zliTp889/MNGszT0egcK2DY g/McxoUhtr8x4hBa8S4naDk0znBXC1BS5diHdf9IqHzesA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxstvRAlBhCQc57QKX1dxV67tPyVZLxeCDqHf1fPzw9umxw8AyO5N2r1mAl82NlRN9i6MaPI5U0yK8zV4uKDI8=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:ec07:: with SMTP id b7mr7782399lfa.9.1591447848523; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 05:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKcm_gMVc88xpkOMmV7L-ybVCBzw+LhNS6Jw3=iB2gutR0ZhxA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gMVc88xpkOMmV7L-ybVCBzw+LhNS6Jw3=iB2gutR0ZhxA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rakesh Gandhi <rgandhi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 08:50:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMZsk6du+H_enTxFgrgKGeJNdw_vm8-+keVdPGbRGPWnvFFzTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "IETF IPPM WG (ippm@ietf.org)" <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b09bb305a769d320"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/3CUyOMtEPRHEwKgBtfBD3leZVx4>
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for STAMP Extensions
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:50:57 -0000

Hi WG, Chairs,
Support the publication of the draft.
I have a comment as follows:

Section 4

What error is returned if the mandatory TLV is not supported by the
reflector?



Section 5- Table 2

Are these all mandatory TLVs? Can we indicate it?


Thanks,

Rakesh



On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 5:26 PM Ian Swett <ianswett=
40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi IPPM,
>
> At our virtual interim meeting, we decided
> draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv was ready for last call. This email starts
> a two-week WGLC for this draft.
>
> The latest version can be found here:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-option-tlv-04
>
> This last call will end on *Monday, June 8th*. Please reply to
> ippm@ietf.org with your reviews and comments.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian & Tommy
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email