IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Thu, 16 May 2013 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DB711E811D for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lDk+tlg3tDk2 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C9C11E8104 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4GJk10h009688; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:46:01 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {51953575-A-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.54]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.48]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:46:01 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
Thread-Index: AQHOUlZ7rCucu8Gu7Ua/fs0xyuHbH5kIBGsAgAAAmAA=
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 19:46:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CDB2D00F-8B83-4D84-B88F-540CC3777F24@checkpoint.com>
References: <D49F3A1B-0BB0-4C48-84FB-00D8D86F0B3C@vpnc.org> <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com> <6A2F45C0AA874BF6814B8E20D0D524DE@chichi>
In-Reply-To: <6A2F45C0AA874BF6814B8E20D0D524DE@chichi>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.9]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 115df002b3d3dc6f43ac7b39a8ad2dcb0016a045c8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7DABA0DDECEFFC44B96A87FBCEB7B648@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 19:46:10 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 19:46:10 -0000

+1

On May 16, 2013, at 10:43 PM, Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
 wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I approved the conclusion.
> 
> Regards,
> Valery.
> 
>> - The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an interoperable solution.
>> - We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
>> - And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation as a starting point.
>> Please send your approval, disapproval or comments to the list within a week (until May 23).
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email