[IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Thu, 16 May 2013 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2FC1F0D30 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 366dPmnHbEq0 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91CA1F0D33 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 11:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost []) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4GIvhbY016012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 May 2013 21:57:43 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.7/8.12.11) id r4GIvh1N011283; Thu, 16 May 2013 21:57:43 +0300 (EEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <20885.11303.337807.961730@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 21:57:43 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com>
References: <D49F3A1B-0BB0-4C48-84FB-00D8D86F0B3C@vpnc.org> <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 24.3.1
X-Edit-Time: 0 min
X-Total-Time: 1 min
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:58:11 -0000

Yaron Sheffer writes:
> - The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an 
> interoperable solution.
> - We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
> - And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using 
> draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation as a starting point.
> Please send your approval, disapproval or comments to the list within a 
> week (until May 23).

I approve the decision to take that draft as starting point. I have
earlier said I do not care wheter it is TCP or fragmentation, but I
think the problem is something that needs to be solved, and I would
prefer to have just one standardized way to solve it.