IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 16 May 2013 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B6321F85D6 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYP8+fBXaSza for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9114221F8F28 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3bBJx35mylz1jb; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:07 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWj0-Py7AODg; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id E1B6981323; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D966180C7D; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 13:08:05 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1305161306290.13917@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <D49F3A1B-0BB0-4C48-84FB-00D8D86F0B3C@vpnc.org> <51950FF7.1050707@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsecME virtual meeting minutes, and way forward with fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:08:21 -0000

On Thu, 16 May 2013, Yaron Sheffer wrote:

> As promised, we just had a virtual interim meeting to discuss IKEv2 
> fragmentation. Please see the minutes below (thanks Paul!).
>
> Following up on this meeting, we would like to confirm the decision on the 
> mailing list:
>
> - The group still thinks this is an important problem that needs an 
> interoperable solution.
> - We would like to abandon the work on IKE-over-TCP.
> - And to work on IKEv2 protocol-level fragmentation, using 
> draft-smyslov-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation as a starting point.

Sorry I missed the meeting. I approve of the conclusions reached.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email