Re: 6MAN Adoption call on draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

On 11/21/2013 07:49 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Fernando Gont <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
>     Once a document becomes a wg item, it is meant to represent the view of
>     the *wg* rather than that of the co-authors or editors.
> 
>     As noted both on- and off-list a number of times, me, I'm fine with
>     s/MUST NOT/SHOULD NOT/.
> 
> Fair enough. Then we'll just wait until the chairs state whether they
> see consensus to adopt this document as is or not. 

FWIW, adopting the document does not meant it is going to remain "as
is". i.e., the goal of adoption of for 6man to work on it and for the
document to review 6man's view, rather than just rubber-stamping what we
the co-authors of this document wrote. (i.e., my understanding is that
the call was for adoption of this document such that 6man works on it
(and apply whatever changes the wg thinks are warranted), rather than a
call for "publishing this document as is").

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492