IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Adoption call on draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Thu, 21 November 2013 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B81AE0BD for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:56:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.746
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.746 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S3UXcfXppA3U for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96EE1AD79D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 09:56:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rALHuEjN032663; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:56:14 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk rALHuEjN032663
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1385056575; bh=mETCs9bPAaWc1ND+UCHGmnfviYA=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=cuUV+7FDtaCpFfNvvQMfMfKYDh/HEyzMAON96jTnLMK21Kjij23U4GzOWeDBOkA1d w1/iAzodUO6Eun0YH1cMRfamy1ah5Z2FKWF2mIW/Owb7GkY8J8uFH/TCJ7akfsDPcY hvnST9TKOTiH8InShcHe9oY2O8nDeekHTwlsgZ7s=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id pAKHuE0959611148d3 ret-id none; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:56:15 +0000
Received: from dhcp-161-22.wireless.soton.ac.uk (dhcp-161-22.wireless.soton.ac.uk [152.78.161.22] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rALHuCkZ014656 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:56:13 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: 6MAN Adoption call on draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <528E1BFA.708@viagenie.ca>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:56:12 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|09f5e8ee958527d9ea6b632c4a1dbccapAKHuE03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|DF62046A-488E-4EA5-B678-42F21098698B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <F681E049-43A2-4A61-8692-C59A1BF356A6@employees.org> <528BBA06.1000405@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr21_9NE730pugGVyKcJxEyD5uq_wMLtimPb3mLmn6tCzQ@mail.gmail.com> <C6A10A33-52F3-4405-AE40-95C1DE9A726B@gmail.com> <528CB92E.4050909@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr12TsgVjCbjY+5e+rf9Bw=1d8-b8aV1=KBp4-oNi6SM_w@mail.gmail.com> <528CD2E4.5020803@innovationslab.net> <CAPv4CP_Z-6_mUci9qcUijrrEXyOBPrYpp+T3WpSyoyAFzh7=fA@mail.gmail.com> <528CDECD.10307@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr2K94bnYnum1TfoA_0rSSo_dk8muN4rSMXx3fR0j6U62g@mail.gmail.com> <528DD843.4040405@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr09jnt+WfYrs8-3wfr3X2d6qncP+S83LL8536WqtivH-Q@mail.gmail.com> <528E1301.8020305@viagenie.ca> <CAKD1Yr35JH93eE5NWsJQh11NYukrzhxApOZoQcdwtBe2M+ny4Q@mail.gmail.com> <528E15B0.7060401@viagenie.ca> <DD02D996-7D9F-4AF3-9E28-382CE0F1B257@gmail.com> <528E1BFA.708@viagenie.ca> <DF62046A-488E-4EA5-B678-42F21098698B@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=pAKHuE095961114800; tid=pAKHuE0959611148d3; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=3:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: rALHuEjN032663
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:56:26 -0000

On 21 Nov 2013, at 14:43, Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:

> Le 2013-11-21 09:22, Ralph Droms a écrit :
>>> You're blowing what I said out of proportion. It's been made clear by our beloved AD that MUST vs SHOULD should not affect the adoption call. I'm just repeating the obvious.
>> 
>> I don't think Brian wrote exactly "MUST vs SHOULD should not affect the adoption call".  I think he wrote that s/MUST/SHOULD/ can be discussed by the WG after adoption, and those expressing an opinion on the adoption call should keep that fact in mind.
>> 
>> The chairs can then consider the objecting opinions and decide if those objections are addressed by Brian's observation, and that "rough consensus" can be declared in favor of adoption.
>> 
>> In my personal opinion the effect of s/MUST/SHOULD/ is important enough in its impact on existing standards like 6LoWPAN header compression that I object to publishing the document as a WG work item until the change is made.  The chairs will evaluate that objection as part of their determination of "rough consensus".
> 
> I fully agree. Thanks for writing that. That's what I would have wanted to write, but I'm not an eloquent man. Anyway, let's not try to find disagreement where there is none.

Yes, well put.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email