IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Adoption call on draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC2A1AE15B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:07:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ff9vCDURboOG for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:07:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe006.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B671AE144 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:07:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail180-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.230) by CO1EHSOBE012.bigfish.com (10.243.66.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:07:00 +0000
Received: from mail180-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail180-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940D42A087B; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:07:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.249.213; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:AM2PRD0710HT004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -15
X-BigFish: PS-15(zz98dI9371I542I1432Izz1f42h2148h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h2146h1202h1e76h20f7h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h1033IL8275bh8275dh1de097hz2dh2a8h5a9h839h947hd24hf0ah1177h1179h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h184fh1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah2222h224fh1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1e23h2218h2216h226dh22d0h304l1d11m1155h)
Received: from mail180-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail180-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1385046418795495_21298; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:06:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.252]) by mail180-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7324C0048; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:06:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM2PRD0710HT004.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.249.213) by CO1EHSMHS023.bigfish.com (10.243.66.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:06:58 +0000
Received: from AMXPRD0310HT002.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.248.133) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.255.165.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.383.1; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:06:46 +0000
Message-ID: <091001cee6ca$e998a380$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <F681E049-43A2-4A61-8692-C59A1BF356A6@employees.org> <528BBA06.1000405@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr21_9NE730pugGVyKcJxEyD5uq_wMLtimPb3mLmn6tCzQ@mail.gmail.com> <C6A10A33-52F3-4405-AE40-95C1DE9A726B@gmail.com> <528CB92E.4050909@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr12TsgVjCbjY+5e+rf9Bw=1d8-b8aV1=KBp4-oNi6SM_w@mail.gmail.com> <528CD2E4.5020803@innovationslab.net> <CAPv4CP_Z-6_mUci9qcUijrrEXyOBPrYpp+T3WpSyoyAFzh7=fA@mail.gmail.com> <528CDECD.10307@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr2K94bnYnum1TfoA_0rSSo_dk8muN4rSMXx3fR0j6U62g@mail.gmail.com> <528DD843.4040405@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr09jnt+WfYrs8-3wfr3X2d6qncP+S83LL8536WqtivH-Q@mail.gmail.com> <528E1301.8020305@viagenie.ca> <CAKD1Yr35JH93eE5NWsJQh11NYukrzhxApOZoQcdwtBe2M+ny4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Adoption call on draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:18:27 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.248.133]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:07:13 -0000

---- Original Message -----
From: "Lorenzo Colitti" <lorenzo@google.com>
To: "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Cc: "IETF IPv6 Mailing List" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 2:11 PM
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Simon Perreault <
> simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>
> > And the chairs will ignore those objections since it has been made
clear
> > that the WG will be free to decide on that after the doc is adopted.
MUST
> > vs SHOULD is irrelevant for the adoption call.
>
> That's ridiculous. Of course the WG is free to decide on anything it
wants
> inside the WG. But that doesn't mean we should adopt a document that
says
> "we should deprecate the IPv6 header" just because "we can change the
> document once we adopt it".

That is exactly what a WG often does, adopt a document that fits the
charter, is along the right lines and, the adopters trust, can be
hammered into the shape they want after adoption. Of course, not all
hammers are the same shape so some may be disapppointed.

On that basis, I say - Adopt.

Views on mould or shust come later.

Tom Petch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email