Re: 6MAN Adoption call on draft-gont-6man-deprecate-eui64-based-addresses-00

[Simon Perreault <[e-mail]>]

Le 2013-11-21 09:22, Ralph Droms a écrit :
>> You're blowing what I said out of proportion. It's been made clear by our beloved AD that MUST vs SHOULD should not affect the adoption call. I'm just repeating the obvious.
>
> I don't think Brian wrote exactly "MUST vs SHOULD should not affect the adoption call".  I think he wrote that s/MUST/SHOULD/ can be discussed by the WG after adoption, and those expressing an opinion on the adoption call should keep that fact in mind.
>
> The chairs can then consider the objecting opinions and decide if those objections are addressed by Brian's observation, and that "rough consensus" can be declared in favor of adoption.
>
> In my personal opinion the effect of s/MUST/SHOULD/ is important enough in its impact on existing standards like 6LoWPAN header compression that I object to publishing the document as a WG work item until the change is made.  The chairs will evaluate that objection as part of their determination of "rough consensus".

I fully agree. Thanks for writing that. That's what I would have wanted 
to write, but I'm not an eloquent man. Anyway, let's not try to find 
disagreement where there is none.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca