IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D09B3A08F6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:11:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N3IPdD6edBkF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:11:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C393A091B for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 12:11:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id f14so1831218qto.12 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:11:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=IULooaV4rHa4vFbVUsv1r+7rfva6WatEa1WVtNWbo0c=; b=eyHpnwMyB/I1jvq/v75seUiqOF468WzUsA1VV8aEY4aIP6kLeiGKRsWZjpD5tlXlDu tRJVvRUY9zJFaGjXnV9WRXwC4/cgIZ1jWlKiM7/DQF8R6WhKi+ZqgkN0X4GrMTtn3hoY eMogj8KbGd2DNgCWiXBiuPxOd39eUZEBLKSziz13+/6InrxhMBpxX7P0wAN7s0Hxpwjb TXted7XUwUuXaHxg+4Aab6OU0hMWhufycXcph5qzsiO7vUJTZnsnV2Bi1f3c63WWV2oU DhpTtMpOWphoJPX+N11iH9rAIvEEMLTnLPB/5/m00X0zimJ2/4H7FmLTj0fSu0+MsHyV +VTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=IULooaV4rHa4vFbVUsv1r+7rfva6WatEa1WVtNWbo0c=; b=nQFl0HxR78SjW5mmdf/Ub3uGJdFCE1r0V9Sy5vwZtqLpvwx0QhZu4dg+Byih6vsuM3 IG4vBR2slmaZ+K5FYppFnXHpN+i89eOcAa6weSrXjn5OxxRkiKH9h0TwzK/25N6VqBxK Z4OkLJTDv891SMb7tZ32NngX0xUhMYMjkyYpZ2mJ0p77ujwFYtk1diwLCINrGr5q7zP8 nWKtwr9xfoH1UO/K5kqNbB51eEdFfb6YIIETJdj22G+I5agpmKDVYVeY2+RHY8ny0/7i B/KoS4b5bCsPMGznB/aaVunI4UtQ+DogY4AEdpR0Ytj54LOsy30ECADRVpmOfkPzVIxE x4XQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pasK6YG5dV6Ve36atkdw9RgviAj1pBVAb+mkos7AMvL8mdAo2 BKj8vjFgbuOSjOJOXFn0IOTwwg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlzQEWPQ+h/LiF8Qdr97Mc161W+B7pAvVWGkOWIHALgIcCHzJ/bHm61GZfJXC4GYQPdJCUmQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6bc2:: with SMTP id b2mr10102234qtt.286.1607371892579; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.241] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z30sm12850575qtc.15.2020.12.07.12.11.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 12:11:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <265D8AB0-82CF-47AE-BE47-B1207D40A3C5@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_98B892A0-3871-4988-88B1-8A70B2C01F39"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Subject: Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:11:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2f1c1e67b96844ce934add51ef2c5f4d@boeing.com>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, "iotops@ietf.org" <iotops@ietf.org>
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <2f1c1e67b96844ce934add51ef2c5f4d@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FMud4ilzuTfru2bWzAQcpRiL2pU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 20:11:57 -0000

On Dec 7, 2020, at 2:38 PM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> It now places a fully-formed DHCPv6 message inside of an OMNI option in
> RS/RA messages so the stub network node can do DHCPv6-PD at the same
> time it does RS/RA (this is something I have talked about before). However,
> right now it only allows for a small-message DHCPv6 exchange from within
> each RS/RA, which should provide ample space for most stub network
> DHCPv6-PD users. Does it look like enough, or should we support bigger?

I’m sorry, Fred, but I’m just not seeing the point of this. Why not just do DHCPv6 PD?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email