Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 07 December 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2FE3A0A81 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:00:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CAxLKa7gClD7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B683A0A3E for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 13:00:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id 186so149743qkj.3 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2V/TDGQa88fmomjRs1AZyrqJ76SclEz3uwN+H6aZqwg=; b=FIqeXcktFJ8Q1A2Dluvu4yujB/5LaNluEZXojRf0CwV7+86sOP3PfRKxQWsQ6P4PVa Hd6JY94OkvwFEjmB2bNCUhZwhWgF7sj0K6+JSOoPpJBCmuT+WT8aopH1xIDHeZ3AZlq9 0DavGSZ7gt92SAdz5OciZf4N4fB7cmib+tk8xCsdWuedp+FGuD0z7vx3U+Tt3HpQTvJz /Vjdtt09F523wjSkrSLIuqjSRIgqoKZHREI3poIrAmEuU+bWRp51HNrpAsC72+WWDvbr PDUZggfWU7Af+03ZWGXspZRGcBiUWHIDqPLgtWpPDN7w8xnOC1kJ5MRrXT1WwDfpYeH3 VviA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2V/TDGQa88fmomjRs1AZyrqJ76SclEz3uwN+H6aZqwg=; b=DbznFBJQTO0/zJxYUx/TR0wXJM+H3SUqJ0rAA8hW+rO6jDz6UqgCiSlH9POaW/niB2 uAdE/E9LT4Huq74PkPHrEMhaeX302ACA9pOA6GXx/ywMAc2A71BkY4Pi7DaNXzOUfF8t 9rfqHVQCR88N9xPWwri7zVelZe9wYgiiZmxoUGFhVLPgHlZWKxf/IcyDm544qv9mTzh1 hezZHxbhBUKDe2WqlzQRH2IocNf6UUSmKE8fGfyHfMgZu8R3/bqNfjPgUBugqCg4LAzo DiXkpg4Tdep4AtaqVcNRqnkvdBnWs1ZixSlxWbzEFLeLEPRDYnrVE4/J7osJ2gNbjX0p RXbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ranm6vd0NKXvK5WYOK5gQ0aDTLuMqEVxB0YP58f1Dz1ppIisI qhAha74HgDBWkqEtm5ssN3rv8Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx8MJ6cRgA2g6QRuoXeRzjs8E8hjR6IbQ5ykLOJ96pZKvma23DnaHEhMGu5Dx27nCYVWhsCYw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a06:: with SMTP id 6mr10530125qkk.376.1607374820460; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.241] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm907456qke.123.2020.12.07.13.00.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:00:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <29095871-34BA-41F7-B292-3A993482618F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4E636FE0-02AB-4F72-B716-296F7FF1A4AF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Subject: Re: [Iotops] Automatically connecting to stub networks...
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 16:00:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <6816090d7f43480490396c569cf6e24b@boeing.com>
Cc: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Ole Trøan <otroan@employees.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, "iotops@ietf.org" <iotops@ietf.org>
To: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <6816090d7f43480490396c569cf6e24b@boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.32)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FRhejz5iff88jMYAthqCzSnYaok>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 21:00:27 -0000

On Dec 7, 2020, at 3:49 PM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> Ted, it surprises me that I don’t seem to be reaching you on this, so maybe we are
> talking about different things? My model for a mobile node

Stub routers aren’t mobile nodes in any meaningful sense. The use case where a “mobile” node might act as a stub router is when it currently tethers, and now needs to provide continuity of service for tethered devices when it has WiFi access. The mobile case is out of scope, and indeed we’ve had a discussion here about issues that come up when tethering with IPv6-only on a mobile device. This is not that discussion.