Re: 6MAN Adoption call on raft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-04

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 01:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012031ADFB0 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:53:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0UcPATYMaoxl for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B151ADF8E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ut6so6293548igb.5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:53:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=mbo3yGKtotSTSnmjMqCtKjLZiWOvrdb+R+Ce8BQiVMM=; b=P4EYBnzetv7EhgOkhr/Hyed0Iw6JfUSzYvAuzCqnYjSLVEwnuJJaJGT/YFxFU91xof ju98UlD1E4O/igc7Z36Z4s0L6sTkSnMMrYATygXuavsgLur2RC+g7by6jv4lpVGu4+kW gJP8ILq1VYpnSmppGhshe+TL5m10118460m+cp6jnLOqekcbfk81epbK3OhDlc5GvDov 5RWAmt3rKBNvntZsa2HTPs/N6kScE7ia4AQljuRSDlUZuV++XdJjFhidsxJ5acqcHnR4 ATtmI1tXJdgzyXyhYkuNZpRlNdACKN6NaRhHe2dQo35WYjcY00SH8ZxKqBjMKJKSZd6K G5mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=mbo3yGKtotSTSnmjMqCtKjLZiWOvrdb+R+Ce8BQiVMM=; b=AsVnQdlfwU7OX+VMC6hxUkjQH0s0zD5f6ioSAErj7C9prHw5gWkoN/aqu8jRvg9Y/7 +2UXwIsTmmdu5FGWUu7BEXLNMIILgjWlETHZusv1RLnUvhu3HOov1JvuHxjxZLFTJxHr Gd63SX0M9P5vdveyHSybGYswY5z7GigT6APSwtDrg+VhAxk1oruYK8TVBjEH9WQUMi72 xA8RkFjyzjAeQFXur+ONkOQ+NB3e2yNqd+l6W+PJwZz6tnvKY89kgiaVCug50dHaby4L u81pvcQzA2faiKSg14BhbSX/me/9k25FopXdx0PpukW/m3vcHrGyi/D2RD4YvWrJNDug WIuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpWygxTV+szsVoVzQJtKpFljiLBKUXA14OzOlEZ0/1axDSL/yCmkVDp3NYotxysKxGOweR+ZD9t8jQk11mHGs9SsD3QpmW7OA/MEPpiQxqaYf7usnuEQe1lMDAGypmOwdDFcdUMurqJhgHRW/2Jb+oZj8lnXUs65saU7N3PqdpIgLql0q1lQKyPr6GcdONkwy/BuLI
X-Received: by 10.43.138.8 with SMTP id iq8mr245336icc.37.1389232402965; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:53:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 17:53:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401081305120.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <1F653502-AD41-4EB6-A43D-541356810DF2@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr1XPKibHenLMcNDRnfCht6X8tF2nMq1HgOiQv6eR9m6Yg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401081305120.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:53:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2AtF1CMqFxE1W63tXrS5OsbhJGfktN=sAaZtsBOSVg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Adoption call on raft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-04
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c20364e3d87604ef7fdfb0"
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 01:53:34 -0000

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:

> For me, another important issue to solve is the ND exhaustion when there
> is scanning going on. So for me, the value of this document is if there is
> a "non-discovery mode" of ND implemented. It might be better to do this in
> a different document, I don't know.
>
> So a mode where the clients use ARO to register their addresses, and
> legacy clients use DHCPv6 for IA_NA and the ND table is populated by these
> two mechanisms and packets destined for unknown IPv6 addresses are just
> dropped.
>
> This would be a big win, especially if it could be done with minimal
> changes to the clients.


You don't need to modify ND to do that, though. You can defend against that
sort of attack by having the ND implementation:

1. Prioritize preserving ND cache entries over making new address
resolution attempts.
2. Glean ND cache entries from DAD packets (and if need be, NS/NA packets),
and prioritize those gleaned entries over new address resolution attempts.

Some of these measures are documented in RFC 6583.