IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 6MAN Adoption call on raft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-04

Havard Eidnes <he@uninett.no> Thu, 09 January 2014 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <he@uninett.no>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A8B1ADE84 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 07:29:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vshGwUnbYTP4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 07:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smistad.uninett.no (smistad.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:0:21e:4fff:feed:ced]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0831AE3B1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 07:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smistad.uninett.no (smistad.uninett.no [158.38.62.77]) by smistad.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076A13D0B3; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:29:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:29:11 +0100
Message-Id: <20140109.162911.09934417.he@uninett.no>
To: lorenzo@google.com
Subject: Re: 6MAN Adoption call on raft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-04
From: Havard Eidnes <he@uninett.no>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr20rimQzQcF6bQry6G=2Pq+jsJbVZ5Nt=Y5_5LAhaAb-Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1401091342250.20074@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr04gCBJsKBoVNGbjS0MV__4px_aspVPkD1+mLGPpdpj4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr20rimQzQcF6bQry6G=2Pq+jsJbVZ5Nt=Y5_5LAhaAb-Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:29:26 -0000

> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Knowing nothing about this, I will cite http://stackoverflow.com/a/4341485, hoping that the draft authors will come along with more detailed data
>> (which hopefully they have already presented to justify their use case and
>> which I missed):
>>
>
> Ok, so in VERY unscientific testing, tcpdump says that in 1 second, my
> phone was able to receive 2500-3000 72-byte IPv6 multicast packets sent by
> my laptop. This is on a 5GHz network using a standard home router access
> point (D-Link DIR-835). That doesn't seem all that slow.

A couple of questions worth pondering: how much of the channel
capacity is consumed by that traffic, and what was the limiting
factor in your experiment.

Regards,

- Håvard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email