Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 10:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6B7126D74 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 02:13:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wPfL0eK0Hj8s for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 02:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x236.google.com (mail-ua0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FCB312994F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 02:13:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 72so38020409uaf.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:13:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HRH3riJG1AKskHkMocF5Hf4du0evPIvnxa+4smi+Ybs=; b=QhKU4geSHu2jm11WmJWx5EHfbykzSW71nXaV8Ds9LpoRnRUt2lQGOoeuFPar5vIDE/ Z8g/29cG6SQv464GUo5ARl9/ewRYoncUP8PKbqv6O1uGjRsmEfxJccAv+hnGlxDWqHu+ GPlsVltt/xwZCoVcSXoVnIXCzlB7PNQOPJjzrtRBdtNoHAuwM8bHKF+8h2FEmvStYi+n 58Hqhs1FAWmBaikd3EGTmQ6BGSSMdnXsRfAR0Xna3+VxPVm00LJWtL2tF70Hf+2/h86r w/EJ4kAhVuAHwMeAjW+jny2z44YYw/Su+1cN8tQADktEjTLZeE4DVrHF6DdBVKBxCHIG DoNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HRH3riJG1AKskHkMocF5Hf4du0evPIvnxa+4smi+Ybs=; b=cLziW+UlNxjJS4dfyieCu2HVrmnvtaP1gwoJrQPsl9PfvPr4ZV1wnwZ0mVOwTZ6Xn0 TkviSgVeMS+uL80lHSb+KLJcZUwwKZMVDjgcZwvk+GzEN3NU8KsBwSL6W1PbHRchHGHk 0tlJwj7xzDILR1/sM8xeZPG579pnpmTgxl1PYMwIrmx5JX3qFAIUYO8gN0n3GlyybB4V mCwZ3vunj2ywI0xgJ9tb8EDJvYLHTZW0pyDZM2sqUvEW++K/T+GZjYqEKBghhVomEssT p0ecIhY2gFJAtmwNDpRHOyrb+Vzv2xvoAloxNC8dSb8zM/Zu9uDVwhLq/85NxrqUV29J 4Q3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n76fca8xRmZkMn49WAClqkua1INRkQpVmmSS0qTn+mbnegL8dPS5kpulP9AvObO5ogEM+dJ8g7mmuPjnZF
X-Received: by 10.159.56.193 with SMTP id w1mr3620619uaf.72.1488363218210; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:13:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 02:13:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170301.110927.104116623.sthaug@nethelp.no>
References: <CAKD1Yr0wK8EiAbz39EZz-xZLtsSV2JROSzNECKtGo36Zc=RZ0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau2N-fv3o9o4807m_fbMktjC6hq28sMZhfECKg5cbb4g6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3tHm5x29w4L5KtKi7PqDHRxkPr6i9mJMtHLaPc2eM2GQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170301.110927.104116623.sthaug@nethelp.no>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:13:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2-ai=S_2XKYpcHQu+Tk5CYH+aV2fU7i8bytFaWpt=kNA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Objection to draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f4162eb651c0549a89015
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/KxuuBNASle95EJhNvc57PMrV1t0>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, James Woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:13:40 -0000

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:09 PM, <sthaug@nethelp.no>; wrote:

> > FWIW I wouldn't oppose an exception for manually-configured addresses on
> > routers.
>
> But you would oppose it for hosts? Then I don't think we're any
> further.
>

Not sure about that. I suppose it also depends on what manual means. If
it's literally just operators configuring them manually by editing
configuration files that's probably fine, but that's not what you want to
do, is it?