Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 05 March 2013 22:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8128011E80BF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:42:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.852, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWelpUDH8tmQ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:42:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f182.google.com (mail-ve0-f182.google.com [209.85.128.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23E711E809C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ox1so6228818veb.41 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:42:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=qjUg4CcPbqRlTVu/uCKW0qi1ETUbwtjzUXLqO4SYBjU=; b=SpIhXiQoC1quVvsROAKUFONc2sJUKdowEWH6SMWHeTYo4fKB9dHQBLeRMELZRq4uw7 ANFiCUlR5WnHnfT4DfvC4KT8pHlbYUMwaV3kIgpBIhI4QL1t/tyq+p6fZQZe/8TDvaVW kjSNGj0PdcTDD0xn8TN/LonaKiVSwL9oi/jmw9EhFo11Ao0BPEnb7d7kr+HjxUg8cznx UVB8NYDOlFoQ1g94/X6vgFAvKDMJwpofN3ey3/qDcjW+1HQU0fTiEzbXfcNEzGpMm8WN sMWDUV6aMfgLoDtNg97IZ+M1Fq+R4EI7LJ12ngSvr43yKfMh1FD5a2ZliCbJvUpBnSZa 4/Hw==
X-Received: by 10.220.150.3 with SMTP id w3mr10268615vcv.37.1362523373363; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:42:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm5868115vdj.5.2013.03.05.14.42.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <005501ce1994$38b763c0$aa262b40$@com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:42:48 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <82E1ECE6-F732-4F93-9AFA-4BF314A8FA25@gmail.com>
References: <7EE61AD6-2E54-4F17-BBFD-30BE77F7E782@gmail.com> <005501ce1994$38b763c0$aa262b40$@com>
To: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:42:54 -0000

Hosneih,

It was a mix of things the chairs thought where important and prior history of the work.  We also, of course, have a fixed amount of time and can't accommodate everything.

See specific comments below.

Bob & Ole

On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:25 AM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:

> Dear All,
> I would appreciate if you explain your criteria for assigning time slot to
> the drafts while other drafts discussed on the mailing list too.  
> The recent discussion on the list about the following drafts that you
> assigned the time slot.
> 
> draft-boucadair-6man-multicast-addr-arch  : 3 discussion on the list : 20
> mins

This is an update from earlier w.g. meetings (there has been a lot of email discussion and presentations).  The chairs and the AD think this is a reasonable compromise to go forward with.

> draft-carpenter-6man-ug  : +10 discussion on the list : 10 mins

Considerable discussion in this and U&G bits in general.

> draft-carpenter-6man-ext-transmit  : 3 discussion on the list  : 15 mins

This is a followup from the previous IETF meeting, the chairs think it's an important issue to resolve, especially creating an IANA registry for IPv6 extension headers.

> draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier : 2 discussion on the list : 15 mins

This was the chairs call as we thought there would be interest in it.  Given the discussion on the list, there appears to be more interest in <draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt> and we propose to swap them.  There isn't time for everything.

Comments?

> draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz  : 1 discussion on the list : 10 mins

This is an IPv6 over Foo document.  The IPv6 w.g. is the appropriate place to standardize these kind of documents.  

> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/maillist.html
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> Hosnieh
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob
> Hinden
> Sent: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 01:03
> To: IPv6 List
> Cc: Bob Hinden
> Subject: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
> 
> You can find the current 6MAN agenda at:
> 
>    http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-6man
> 
> We prioritized drafts that are working group items and drafts that have been
> actively discussed on the list.  
> 
> As you will note in the agenda, there is a "if time allowed" section at the
> end with short presentations on:
> 
>   A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6 AutoConfiguration
> 	draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt
>   6LoWPAN Backbone Router
> 	draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-02.txt
>   DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
> 	draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt
> 
> We did not think there had been enough discussion or interest on the w.g.
> list to guarantee a speaking slot.  We allocated short slots at the end of
> the session if there is time before the meeting ends.  If anyone (other than
> the authors) think one of these should be given more time, please speak up.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob & Ole
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>