Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86

[Bob Hinden <[e-mail]>]

Hosnieh,

On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:

> Dear Bob,
> 
> Thanks for the explanation. I would ask that you correct the version number
> of my draft to 2 in the following link:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-6man .

Fixed.

> I would also ask
> that I at least be given some time to explain the purpose of this draft and
> the differences between the current mechanisms.

Assume we run on time, you should have time for that.  

> It appears that my draft has not been added to those of the 6man drafts, at
> least I can't find it and it is also missing from the PDF agenda, while all
> other drafts are listed at your link:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/86/agenda.html.

I don't have any control over that, must be some delay from when it is updated.  Try reloading the page.

Bob


> 
> Thank you,
> Hosnieh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:43 PM
> To: Hosnieh Rafiee
> Cc: Bob Hinden; 'Ole Troan'; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
> 
> Hosneih,
> 
> It was a mix of things the chairs thought where important and prior history
> of the work.  We also, of course, have a fixed amount of time and can't
> accommodate everything.
> 
> See specific comments below.
> 
> Bob & Ole
> 
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:25 AM, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>> I would appreciate if you explain your criteria for assigning time 
>> slot to the drafts while other drafts discussed on the mailing list too.
>> The recent discussion on the list about the following drafts that you 
>> assigned the time slot.
>> 
>> draft-boucadair-6man-multicast-addr-arch  : 3 discussion on the list : 
>> 20 mins
> 
> This is an update from earlier w.g. meetings (there has been a lot of email
> discussion and presentations).  The chairs and the AD think this is a
> reasonable compromise to go forward with.
> 
>> draft-carpenter-6man-ug  : +10 discussion on the list : 10 mins
> 
> Considerable discussion in this and U&G bits in general.
> 
>> draft-carpenter-6man-ext-transmit  : 3 discussion on the list  : 15 
>> mins
> 
> This is a followup from the previous IETF meeting, the chairs think it's an
> important issue to resolve, especially creating an IANA registry for IPv6
> extension headers.
> 
>> draft-gont-6man-ipv6-smurf-amplifier : 2 discussion on the list : 15 
>> mins
> 
> This was the chairs call as we thought there would be interest in it.  Given
> the discussion on the list, there appears to be more interest in
> <draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt> and we propose to swap them.
> There isn't time for everything.
> 
> Comments?
> 
>> draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz  : 1 discussion on the list : 10 mins
> 
> This is an IPv6 over Foo document.  The IPv6 w.g. is the appropriate place
> to standardize these kind of documents.  
> 
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/maillist.html
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Hosnieh
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf 
>> Of Bob Hinden
>> Sent: Dienstag, 5. März 2013 01:03
>> To: IPv6 List
>> Cc: Bob Hinden
>> Subject: 6MAN Agenda for IETF86
>> 
>> You can find the current 6MAN agenda at:
>> 
>>   http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/agenda/agenda-86-6man
>> 
>> We prioritized drafts that are working group items and drafts that 
>> have been actively discussed on the list.
>> 
>> As you will note in the agenda, there is a "if time allowed" section 
>> at the end with short presentations on:
>> 
>>  A Simple Secure Addressing Generation Scheme for IPv6 AutoConfiguration
>> 	draft-rafiee-6man-ssas-01.txt
>>  6LoWPAN Backbone Router
>> 	draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-02.txt
>>  DHCPv6/SLAAC Address Configuration Interaction Problem Statement
>> 	draft-liu-bonica-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-01.txt
>> 
>> We did not think there had been enough discussion or interest on the w.g.
>> list to guarantee a speaking slot.  We allocated short slots at the 
>> end of the session if there is time before the meeting ends.  If 
>> anyone (other than the authors) think one of these should be given more
> time, please speak up.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Bob & Ole
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>