Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

"Daniel Awduche" <awduche@awduche.com> Mon, 12 November 2012 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <SRS0=xyCqz9=JI=awduche.com=awduche@srs.bis6.us.blackberry.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4F521F86E5; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:16:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.846
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.846 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khyO9RjzUYlH; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp08.bis6.us.blackberry.com (smtp08.bis6.us.blackberry.com [74.82.85.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3935221F8696; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:16:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from b15.c23.bise6.blackberry ([192.168.0.115]) by srs.bis6.us.blackberry.com (8.13.7 TEAMON/8.13.7) with ESMTP id qACGhQun007302; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:15:36 GMT
X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 384438043
Message-ID: <384438043-1352744136-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1255086084-@b15.c23.bise6.blackberry>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: Normal
References: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk> <2835D71F-AEAE-49B3-8805-99F129C3F168@juniper.net> <50A11923.4040004@cisco.com> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D4482FBF5@dfweml505-mbx> <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD302525617@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAG4d1rfyua9L26H9=x9Q1BPj9RzgRXv-QGX5XvyV72eg87-2dw@mail.gmail.com> <50A12F9F.2040803@gmail.com> <50A134E0.4090701@queuefull.net> <CAFC8oMacomsSpTdvg8+cwny30TpcBTza1JiKhBtjinGEiPR0xA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFC8oMacomsSpTdvg8+cwny30TpcBTza1JiKhBtjinGEiPR0xA@mail.gmail.com>
Sensitivity: Normal
Importance: Normal
To: "Russell Harrison" <russell.harrison@sungard.com>, irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org, irs-discuss@ietf.org
From: "Daniel Awduche" <awduche@awduche.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:15:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: awduche@awduche.com
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:22:45 -0000

I concur. ITRS and I2RS are both good alternatives to IRS. 


Regards,
Daniel O. Awduche
Sent from my Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Harrison <russell.harrison@sungard.com>
Sender: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:44:00 
To: <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

I don't think the name matters too much - but anything other than IRS
would have a positive influence on the signal to noise ratio of search
results.

-RH

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Benson Schliesser
<bensons@queuefull.net> wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion about using the name "IRS". On one hand, I
> doubt it matters much; given a little context I don't expect anybody will be
> confused about what it is. On the other hand, a different name might help
> with web searches, avoid misunderstandings, etc.
>
> So, if the ADs aren't bothered by the name IRS then I propose we keep it and
> move forward with technical discussion. Alternatively, if the ADs would
> prefer a different name then I propose something like Routing Influence
> System (RIS) [*], or indeed any of the suggestions made this morning. The
> only thing that's important is to make the choice quickly, to keep focus on
> technical discussion instead.
>
> Cheers,
> -Benson
>
> * ...because Routing Influence Protocol (RIP) seemed like another flavor of
> the same problem...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
irs-discuss mailing list
irs-discuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss