Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

"Senad.palislamovic" <senad.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <senad.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DC521F87BF for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:08:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bvY2LXQ479WS for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:08:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C1621F880A for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:08:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fb11so4888426pad.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:08:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=Wf54lnOn7ZZ7MJ33Cyf4KRqWOr2AZ3bi36udYeG8UQs=; b=JkmFED1cdNKlcwwRpByMU4ZSzWPcTIticg536LCPercWpTvbG5dd8kJmtdLKl7OgfT DAkFKYvgQsKuFuRxqYU1EgVtS6yzivuqwBcfIN9r7BakbanFwKAonL+GFzjN3aE+FHAW AHEb3gC7i4CRHiWwtT/hGyQsY2ekoVOResegWeKY+tLOcrJTTwBPDw2HKQ6aeLWK8OEr YkV7XYzIlaMabIpfgr0Q1T4OIQ4LHMCmTaG0be0EcOf7zgewaWEToLMxH7zCJTd8USLO Wtv+tHtN6LBcLuWTNV70hnfLPcO1nE+YL1F65K4WEj5q2wnq04lG9eIfsQfbBVTdHzTL Yx8Q==
Received: by 10.66.78.136 with SMTP id b8mr60437211pax.26.1352772536306; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:08:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.136.36.248] (mobile-198-228-208-183.mycingular.net. [198.228.208.183]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc4sm5096420pbc.30.2012.11.12.18.08.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:08:55 -0800 (PST)
References: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk> <2835D71F-AEAE-49B3-8805-99F129C3F168@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <2835D71F-AEAE-49B3-8805-99F129C3F168@juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <6D21D337-2DE8-423D-8908-4A498438830D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405)
From: "Senad.palislamovic" <senad.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:05:17 -0800
To: Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>
Cc: "<adrian@olddog.co.uk>" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:08:57 -0000

+1 for I2RS

/senad

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>; wrote:

> My first set of suggestions:
> 
> I2RS- interface 2 routing system.
> 
> IRNE - interface to routing network element.
> IRE - interface to routing element
> INE - interface to network element.
> APIRS - API to RS.
> APIRE
> 
> Ravi 
> On Nov 12, 2012, at 9:56 AM, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; wrote:
> 
>> Personally, I find discussions of what name/acronym to use a bit sad. I've had
>> enough code review hours wasted debating the names of variables to not want to
>> spend any more time on this sort of thing.
>> 
>> However, I note that there was some unease about the use of IRS. If we really
>> need to find a new name for this work (and I note that RSI is also used for
>> something else) we need to find a solution soon.
>> 
>> Can I suggest that only those people who have a strong objection to IRS need to
>> contribute to the discussion. Furthermore, we don't need suggestions to be
>> floated, we need solid and definite proposals. That way we will possibly reach a
>> serious conclusion quickly.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss