IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?

"Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com> Tue, 13 November 2012 01:05 UTC

Return-Path: <rogaglia@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABE521F87D0; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:05:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.024
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.024 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.575, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qNRvH0tBVcXv; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD4F21F87AA; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:05:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2264; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1352768753; x=1353978353; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=HkwAKXCdEoAeXSDIC08H3iYG32DvoKhELVWh1g/zZw8=; b=jlgCcN4UgSYpTHLhhKRCdF4M5NboeRA1hjNnmjIK1eiFVwrx8Q7KRR5b 9jNxyv9xHsmbWtqpHcw58SmnUwkvs6vNYJG4wsUxNs8xdj5wfI4HEplyj PIxP8ZTNkjkVMYK+8GIRLqAR7YZMitx0uWeSMT4O2Qjookf4lBO3rhFcf Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADOboVCtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABEw2OBCIIeAQEBAwEBAQEPAScuBgsFBwQCAQgRAwECAQoUECcLHQgCBA4FCAEZh2IGC5l4j2WQLowVhWlhA6RUgWuCb4IZ
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6894"; a="141532572"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2012 01:05:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAD15qWe005887 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:05:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.241]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:05:51 -0600
From: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>
To: "<awduche@awduche.com>" <awduche@awduche.com>
Thread-Topic: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
Thread-Index: Ac3A5PsIVqU8XiJmRGOy8kKrHtrEtQAAkBWdAA3ho4AAANLZAAAAfEcAAAHE2YAAAEW8gAAAyGwAAAATEwAAARqtgAAOU58A
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:05:50 +0000
Message-ID: <EF4348D391D0334996EE9681630C83F021093184@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
References: <015701cdc0e4$fbc439f0$f34cadd0$@olddog.co.uk> <2835D71F-AEAE-49B3-8805-99F129C3F168@juniper.net> <50A11923.4040004@cisco.com> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D4482FBF5@dfweml505-mbx> <62CCD4C52ACDAD4481149BD5D8A72FD302525617@CH1PRD0510MB355.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAG4d1rfyua9L26H9=x9Q1BPj9RzgRXv-QGX5XvyV72eg87-2dw@mail.gmail.com> <50A12F9F.2040803@gmail.com> <50A134E0.4090701@queuefull.net> <CAFC8oMacomsSpTdvg8+cwny30TpcBTza1JiKhBtjinGEiPR0xA@mail.gmail.com> <384438043-1352744136-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1255086084-@b15.c23.bise6.blackberry>
In-Reply-To: <384438043-1352744136-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1255086084-@b15.c23.bise6.blackberry>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.154.48.127]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19356.005
x-tm-as-result: No--35.904700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <30B61B3FB5EF44429E21B450660C7549@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>" <irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>, "<irs-discuss@ietf.org>" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>, Russell Harrison <russell.harrison@sungard.com>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:05:53 -0000

-1 on ITRs.

Bad timing also to chose that name as the ITU is discussing ITRs in next WCIT conference. More info here:
http://www.internetsociety.org/itr

Roque


On Nov 12, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Daniel Awduche wrote:

> I concur. ITRS and I2RS are both good alternatives to IRS. 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel O. Awduche
> Sent from my Mobile
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Harrison <russell.harrison@sungard.com>
> Sender: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:44:00 
> To: <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] What's in a name?
> 
> I don't think the name matters too much - but anything other than IRS
> would have a positive influence on the signal to noise ratio of search
> results.
> 
> -RH
> 
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Benson Schliesser
> <bensons@queuefull.net> wrote:
>> I don't have a strong opinion about using the name "IRS". On one hand, I
>> doubt it matters much; given a little context I don't expect anybody will be
>> confused about what it is. On the other hand, a different name might help
>> with web searches, avoid misunderstandings, etc.
>> 
>> So, if the ADs aren't bothered by the name IRS then I propose we keep it and
>> move forward with technical discussion. Alternatively, if the ADs would
>> prefer a different name then I propose something like Routing Influence
>> System (RIS) [*], or indeed any of the suggestions made this morning. The
>> only thing that's important is to make the choice quickly, to keep focus on
>> technical discussion instead.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> -Benson
>> 
>> * ...because Routing Influence Protocol (RIP) seemed like another flavor of
>> the same problem...
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> irs-discuss mailing list
>> irs-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email