Re: [Json] Proposed minimal change for duplicate names in objects

[John Cowan <[e-mail]>]

Carsten Bormann scripsit:

> In many JSON designs, the receiver knows the full set of keys ahead
> of time.  In this case, you are better off with conditionally interning
> it (i.e., if I already have the symbol, return it, otherwise keep the
> string around, now we know that it didn't map to a known key).

I don't know any way to do that in Java, because there seems to be no
way to ask if a string is interned except by interning it.

-- 
John Cowan   [e-mail]    http://ccil.org/~cowan
I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths
led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen.  I am the clue-finder,
the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number.  --Bilbo