IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Mon, 04 August 2014 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D711A04B1; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wL70mEdczX5j; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278421A0421; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EF83B8062; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=td1OSiz9MpFcQhbmHetNZas/W5U=; b=A+joMFJzs4L vGiPnBQUatZsEJTvMsYoV4ocUCiWJ1NfK6EHRBzDr1b+Xoryhs8xWR8HEmKzMpZK N82zz6y2ZbcpjztPs3vn6DbZco6xU42H+G5tqdURZL3iha+OMM05w9YxvgN9cNg+ nd7LQOZsvdHD34EA6aSQAxKnz62uVOn4=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a96.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 888443B805C; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:44:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:44:08 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
Message-ID: <20140804164406.GK3579@localhost>
References: <DC941FEB-725A-49E1-8C38-FF765454827C@netapp.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1407301239260.21571@multics.mit.edu> <20140801224505.GB3579@localhost> <DB49D4A2-0EFF-4338-8F15-8459EEEBD5E8@netapp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DB49D4A2-0EFF-4338-8F15-8459EEEBD5E8@netapp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/DH-MHwdnypM5p2mghwmXmAOJrMU
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:44:10 -0000

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:38:16PM +0000, Adamson, Andy wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:45 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> >> Why is RPCSEC_GSS_BIND_CHANNEL marked as "not used" in the sample
> >> code on page 7?  It is not otherwise mentioned in the draft, and the
> > 
> > Dunno.  It was never marked so in my draft.  Andy?
> 
> It is marked as “not used” in GSSv3 because GSSv3 provides it’s own channel binding method.

Ah, right, that's a v2 thing.  Thanks for reminding me!

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status