Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review

"Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com> Mon, 04 August 2014 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0D51A0059; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvMarnyta95T; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.netapp.com (mx1.netapp.com [216.240.18.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F3B1A0019; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,799,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="337397197"
Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) by mx1-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2014 09:56:03 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX08-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.41) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.106.77.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:55:59 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) by hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.22; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:55:58 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::6112:44a3:1946:292f%21]) with mapi id 15.00.0913.011; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 09:55:58 -0700
From: "Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review
Thread-Index: AQHPrAU48wbIQBIMg0W+Un2kpIHDeZu7PYKAgAB5yoCAAPRMgIAAHfIAgARdswA=
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:55:57 +0000
Message-ID: <DDC64AA5-C2B4-404A-A864-212A3A3AECF1@netapp.com>
References: <DC941FEB-725A-49E1-8C38-FF765454827C@netapp.com> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1407301239260.21571@multics.mit.edu> <20140801055401.GA7409@localhost> <8FD0C272-6FD3-44FE-BD3D-BAB220E0FF13@netapp.com> <20140801221535.GA3579@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20140801221535.GA3579@localhost>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
x-originating-ip: [10.122.56.79]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <5096B889A7C7B444BB2BD24131998673@hq.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/zXH3as2DEEho8lMAJ9nd5aAwglc
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>, "Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@netapp.com>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] [nfsv4] draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3: request for review
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 16:56:09 -0000


On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> (Was "multi-principal" my name for this?  No, I called them compound
> authentication.  I prefer "compound”.)

Hi NIco

I changed the name from ‘compound’ to multi-principal’ in response the review comments at IETF 89 where many NFSv4 WG members expressed that ‘compound’ had too many meanings (especially in NFSv4.x) and led to confusion.

—>Andy