RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

I also prefer ANCP.

cheers,
Peter 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:andymalis@comcast.net] 
> Sent: 4. april 2006 16:15
> To: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk
> Cc: l2CP@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
> 
> Matthew,
> 
> I prefer ANCP.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andy
> 
> At 4/4/2006 12:53 +0100, Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk wrote:
> >All,
> >
> >We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names for the
> >working group.
> >
> >There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of 
> either BAMP or
> >GAMP. However, there also seem to be a reasonable number of 
> people who
> >would not like to see 'management' in the WG name, as it would more
> >accurately be described as a control protocol.
> >
> >Of the other names, there were few that included control, 
> did not clash
> >with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 control" 
> (which was one of
> >the problems with L2CP).
> >
> >In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can 
> you indicate your
> >preference between the following:
> >
> >ANCO (Access Node Control)
> >
> >ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Matthew
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> L2cp mailing list
> L2cp@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp
> 

_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp