Re: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

Matthew,

I prefer ANCP.

Thanks,
Andy

At 4/4/2006 12:53 +0100, Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk wrote:
>All,
>
>We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names for the
>working group.
>
>There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of either BAMP or
>GAMP. However, there also seem to be a reasonable number of people who
>would not like to see 'management' in the WG name, as it would more
>accurately be described as a control protocol.
>
>Of the other names, there were few that included control, did not clash
>with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 control" (which was one of
>the problems with L2CP).
>
>In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can you indicate your
>preference between the following:
>
>ANCO (Access Node Control)
>
>ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol)
>
>Thanks,
>Matthew

_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp