Re: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

I'm in favor of ANCP. But if the dynamicity item needs to be 
highlighted, I think DANCO also works nicely.

Sven

Sanjay Wadhwa wrote:
> I prefer ANCP (although ANCO works too)..To accomodate Jerome's point
> though, we might want to consider DANCO (dynamic access node control) 
> 
> -Sanjay
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk [mailto:Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk]
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:53 AM
>>To: l2CP@ietf.org
>>Subject: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
>>
>>
>>All,
>>
>>We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names for the
>>working group.
>>
>>There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of 
>>either BAMP or
>>GAMP. However, there also seem to be a reasonable number of people who
>>would not like to see 'management' in the WG name, as it would more
>>accurately be described as a control protocol.
>>
>>Of the other names, there were few that included control, did not clash
>>with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 control" (which 
>>was one of
>>the problems with L2CP).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can you 
>>indicate your
>>preference between the following:
>>
>>
>>ANCO (Access Node Control)
>>
>>
>>ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Matthew
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>L2cp mailing list
>>L2cp@ietf.org
>>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> L2cp mailing list
> L2cp@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp
> 

_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp