IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

"Kim Hyldgaard \(ST/LMD\)" <kim.hyldgaard@ericsson.com> Tue, 04 April 2006 14:48 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQmpN-0008Jf-SQ; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:48:17 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQmpN-0008Ja-0B for l2CP@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:48:17 -0400
Received: from mailgw3.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.60]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQmpL-0001Ar-Bt for l2CP@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:48:16 -0400
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.121]) by mailgw3.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id ABA071180; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:47:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.170]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:47:09 +0200
Received: from esealmw104.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.67]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:47:09 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:47:08 +0200
Message-ID: <D5D247EC1EFAE74386F64C1BC50288B0035C4A5D@esealmw104.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
Thread-Index: AcZX3mRvirFI65qTRau4/TqWS3a5VAAGC77Q
From: "Kim Hyldgaard (ST/LMD)" <kim.hyldgaard@ericsson.com>
To: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk, l2CP@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2006 14:47:09.0028 (UTC) FILETIME=[A64D1A40:01C657F6]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da
Cc:
X-BeenThere: l2cp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Control Protocol Discussion List <l2cp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/l2cp>
List-Post: <mailto:l2cp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: l2cp-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Matthew,

I prefer ANCP.

Br
Kim
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk [mailto:Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk] 
Sent: 4. april 2006 13:53
To: l2CP@ietf.org
Subject: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

All,

We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names for the
working group.

There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of either BAMP
or GAMP. However, there also seem to be a reasonable number of people
who would not like to see 'management' in the WG name, as it would more
accurately be described as a control protocol.

Of the other names, there were few that included control, did not clash
with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 control" (which was one of
the problems with L2CP).





In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can you indicate
your preference between the following:


ANCO (Access Node Control)


ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol)





Thanks,





Matthew









_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp

_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email